> As it'll be postponed for 4.6.2 I guess it will receive enough testing, so
> ok.
I'm not sure you're really convinced either. :-) IMO putting it on the branch
after the 4.6.1 release won't increase the testing much there, since people
generally test/use releases or mainline. You get the real
On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 1:46 PM, Eric Botcazou wrote:
>> Apart from
>>
>> 2011-06-02 Eric Botcazou
>>
>> * cse.c (cse_find_path): Refine change to exclude EDGE_ABNORMAL_CALL
>> edges only, when there is a non-local label in the function.
>> * postreload-gcse.c (bb_has_well_
> Apart from
>
> 2011-06-02 Eric Botcazou
>
>* cse.c (cse_find_path): Refine change to exclude EDGE_ABNORMAL_CALL
>edges only, when there is a non-local label in the function.
>* postreload-gcse.c (bb_has_well_behaved_predecessors): Likewise.
>
> and the removal of SETJMP
On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 01:21:39PM +0200, Richard Guenther wrote:
> Otherwise you are a sparc maintainer, its a primary
> platform, and I expect you're not going to break it. Thus, for a
> target specific feature backport to a .1 release I think it's ok. But
> please coordinate with Jakub who wan
2011/6/20 Eric Botcazou :
> Dear RMs,
>
> I'd like to have permission to backport the new -mflat support for SPARC from
> the mainline to the 4.6 branch. I received the first requests to reinstate
> the option last year, when Laurent (and some others) started to work on it,
> but the initial patch
Dear RMs,
I'd like to have permission to backport the new -mflat support for SPARC from
the mainline to the 4.6 branch. I received the first requests to reinstate
the option last year, when Laurent (and some others) started to work on it,
but the initial patch was submitted too late in the 4.6
