[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 24/06/2007 01:17:34:
I tested it on powerpc64-linux with the default option
--with-cpu=default32.
Ah, so this is a 32-bit compiler like on sparc64-linux?
--with-cpu=default32 means that the compiler itself and it's produced
code are 32 bits by default.
Revital
Maybe the problem will arise on other platforms and we'll be able to debug
it.
SPARC/Solaris 32-bit is OK. I'm going to try the 64-bit variant.
--
Eric Botcazou
I'm going to try the 64-bit variant.
SPARC/Solaris 64-bit is OK, as well as IA-64/Linux according to:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2007-06/msg01044.html
Do you test PowerPC 32-bit or should I try a build on Darwin or AIX?
--
Eric Botcazou
Eric Botcazou [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 23/06/2007 21:50:57:
I'm going to try the 64-bit variant.
SPARC/Solaris 64-bit is OK, as well as IA-64/Linux according to:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2007-06/msg01044.html
Do you test PowerPC 32-bit or should I try a build on Darwin
I tested it on powerpc64-linux with the default option
--with-cpu=default32.
Ah, so this is a 32-bit compiler like on sparc64-linux?
--
Eric Botcazou
Hello,
I get the following bootstrap comparison failure on powerpc64
for Ada (--enable-languages=ada) with BOOT_CFLAGS='-O2'.
Revital
make[2]: Entering directory `/home/revital/mainline_ccp/build'
make[3]: Entering directory `/home/revital/mainline_ccp/build'
rm -f stage_current
make[3
I get the following bootstrap comparison failure on powerpc64
for Ada (--enable-languages=ada) with BOOT_CFLAGS='-O2'.
Revital
make[2]: Entering directory `/home/revital/mainline_ccp/build'
make[3]: Entering directory `/home/revital/mainline_ccp/build'
rm -f stage_current
make[3
make[2]: Entering directory `/home/revital/mainline_ccp/build'
make[3]: Entering directory `/home/revital/mainline_ccp/build'
rm -f stage_current
make[3]: Leaving directory `/home/revital/mainline_ccp/build'
Comparing stages 2 and 3
warning: ./cc1-checksum.o differs
Bootstrap
Which revision? The Ada compiler bootstraps fine on i586 and x86-64 at
revision 125912:125915M (i.e with structural alias analysis enabled).
revision 125915.
Thanks,
Revital
Which revision? The Ada compiler bootstraps fine on i586 and x86-64 at
revision 125912:125915M (i.e with structural alias analysis enabled).
Note that if cc1-checksum.o differs, it likely means the issue is
unrelated to
Ada.
I am now bootstrapping only c. If that will pass OK I can
Note that if cc1-checksum.o differs, it likely means the issue is unrelated
to Ada.
cc1-checksum.o very offen differs on my machine, it doesn't stop the build.
--
Eric Botcazou
I am now bootstrapping only c. If that will pass OK I can check Ada on
an older revision if you wish.
I'm not sure that would really help in this case. The fact that x86 and
x86-64 are both clean with structural alias analysis would seem to show
that there is no fundamental bad interaction
Eric Botcazou [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 21/06/2007 21:10:15:
I am now bootstrapping only c. If that will pass OK I can check Ada on
an older revision if you wish.
I'm not sure that would really help in this case. The fact that x86 and
x86-64 are both clean with structural alias
13 matches
Mail list logo
