Hi Fred,
If you have access to a lm32 toolchain, can you test if gcc.c-
torture/execute/built-in-setjmp.c passes at different optimization levels?
For a SVN snapshot from yesterday, patched so it fixes the problem Nathan
mentioned:
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/built-in-setjmp.c execution,
Hi Nathan,
lm32 has a gdb simulator available, so it should be fairly easy to write
a board file for it if one doesn't already exist.
Unfortunately, building lm32-elf is broken in several different ways
right now.
What problems do you have building lm32-elf? If you let me know, I can try
Hi Jon,
Le mardi 26 octobre 2010 à 13:07 +0100, Jon Beniston a écrit :
What problems do you have building lm32-elf? If you let me know, I can try
to look in to them.
If you have access to a lm32 toolchain, can you test if
gcc.c-torture/execute/built-in-setjmp.c passes at different optimization
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 01:07:26PM +0100, Jon Beniston wrote:
lm32 has a gdb simulator available, so it should be fairly easy to write
a board file for it if one doesn't already exist.
Unfortunately, building lm32-elf is broken in several different ways
right now.
What problems do
On 22 October 2010 20:17, Ian Lance Taylor i...@google.com wrote:
Frederic Riss frederic.r...@gmail.com writes:
OK... what's the best way forward on this? Do we just leave it as it
is and wait until an official port needs complains about it? Should it
be filled in bugzilla?
Did you just
Frederic Riss frederic.r...@gmail.com writes:
On 22 October 2010 20:17, Ian Lance Taylor i...@google.com wrote:
Frederic Riss frederic.r...@gmail.com writes:
OK... what's the best way forward on this? Do we just leave it as it
is and wait until an official port needs complains about it?
On 21 October 2010 16:49, Nathan Froyd froy...@codesourcery.com wrote:
Is it easy to test lm32 on some simulator?
lm32 has a gdb simulator available, so it should be fairly easy to write
a board file for it if one doesn't already exist.
Unfortunately, building lm32-elf is broken in several
Frederic Riss frederic.r...@gmail.com writes:
On 21 October 2010 16:49, Nathan Froyd froy...@codesourcery.com wrote:
Is it easy to test lm32 on some simulator?
lm32 has a gdb simulator available, so it should be fairly easy to write
a board file for it if one doesn't already exist.
Hi Ian,
On 19 October 2010 15:31, Ian Lance Taylor i...@google.com wrote:
It should not be necessary to use STARTING_FRAME_OFFSET when using
virtual_stack_vars_rtx, as it should be added in by the vregs pass. See
instantiate_new_reg, and note that var_offset is set to
STARTING_FRAME_OFFSET.
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 02:14:15PM +0200, Frederic Riss wrote:
On 19 October 2010 15:31, Ian Lance Taylor i...@google.com wrote:
However, I agree that it does seem that it should be added to or
subtracted from hard_frame_pointer_rtx before setting
virtual_stack_vars_rtx, or something. I
Hi,
in builtins.c:expand_builtin_setjmp_receiver I see the following code:
827 /* Now put in the code to restore the frame pointer, and argument
828 pointer, if needed. */
829 #ifdef HAVE_nonlocal_goto
830 if (! HAVE_nonlocal_goto)
831 #endif
832 {
833 emit_move_insn
Frederic Riss frederic.r...@gmail.com writes:
in builtins.c:expand_builtin_setjmp_receiver I see the following code:
827 /* Now put in the code to restore the frame pointer, and argument
828 pointer, if needed. */
829 #ifdef HAVE_nonlocal_goto
830 if (! HAVE_nonlocal_goto)
831
12 matches
Mail list logo
