On Fri, 28 Jan 2011, Joel Sherrill wrote:
This almost works but libstdc++-v3/configure.ac explicitly
checks $with_newlib to trip some AC_DEFINE's which have
to be tripped to build. I have a patch attached that logically
says if on target X, then you are always using newlib so
if you have
On 01/28/2011 07:49 AM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
Ralf Corsepiusralf.corsep...@rtems.org writes:
On 01/27/2011 07:15 PM, Joel Sherrill wrote:
What is the preferred combination of
--enable-newlib and --with-newlib settings
to build with newlib in the gcc source tree
but not build it and use
Ralf Corsepius ralf.corsep...@rtems.org writes:
- Remove newlib from the source tree
--without-newlib should probably be enough.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, sch...@redhat.com
GPG Key fingerprint = D4E8 DBE3 3813 BB5D FA84 5EC7 45C6 250E 6F00 984E
And now for something completely different.
On 01/28/2011 10:15 AM, Andreas Schwab wrote:
Ralf Corsepiusralf.corsep...@rtems.org writes:
- Remove newlib from the source tree
--without-newlib should probably be enough.
Good point, agreed.
In case of Joel and rtems the situation probably can be furtherly
simplified:
RTEMS has
On 01/28/2011 04:58 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 01/28/2011 10:15 AM, Andreas Schwab wrote:
Ralf Corsepiusralf.corsep...@rtems.org writes:
- Remove newlib from the source tree
--without-newlib should probably be enough.
Good point, agreed.
In case of Joel and rtems the situation probably
Andreas Schwab sch...@redhat.com writes:
Ralf Corsepius ralf.corsep...@rtems.org writes:
- Remove newlib from the source tree
--without-newlib should probably be enough.
But that seems strange to me as some of the configure scripts test for
--with-newlib and adjust their configury
On 01/28/2011 04:17 PM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
Andreas Schwabsch...@redhat.com writes:
Ralf Corsepiusralf.corsep...@rtems.org writes:
- Remove newlib from the source tree
--without-newlib should probably be enough.
But that seems strange to me as some of the configure scripts test for
On 01/28/2011 09:17 AM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
Andreas Schwabsch...@redhat.com writes:
Ralf Corsepiusralf.corsep...@rtems.org writes:
- Remove newlib from the source tree
--without-newlib should probably be enough.
But that seems strange to me as some of the configure scripts test for
On 01/28/2011 05:48 PM, Joel Sherrill wrote:
On 01/28/2011 09:17 AM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
Andreas Schwabsch...@redhat.com writes:
Ralf Corsepiusralf.corsep...@rtems.org writes:
- Remove newlib from the source tree
--without-newlib should probably be enough.
But that seems strange to
Hi,
There are now 14 RTEMS targets which I try to
test regularly on the head. Where possible,
I try to test C, C++, Ada, and Go. The procedure
is roughly
+ build and install C, C++ with newlib multilibed
+ build and install RTEMS
+ build and install C, Adawith newlib multilibed
+ build and
On 01/27/2011 07:15 PM, Joel Sherrill wrote:
Hi,
There are now 14 RTEMS targets which I try to
test regularly on the head. Where possible,
I try to test C, C++, Ada, and Go. The procedure
is roughly
+ build and install C, C++ with newlib multilibed
+ build and install RTEMS
+ build and install
Ralf Corsepius ralf.corsep...@rtems.org writes:
On 01/27/2011 07:15 PM, Joel Sherrill wrote:
What is the preferred combination of
--enable-newlib and --with-newlib settings
to build with newlib in the gcc source tree
but not build it and use the installed copy
for the Ada and Go builds?
12 matches
Mail list logo
