Re: [PATCH GCC 6/9]Simplify control flow graph for vectorized loop

> Hi, > This is the main patch improving control flow graph for vectorized loop. It > generally rewrites loop peeling stuff in vectorizer. As described in patch, > for a typical loop to be vectorized like: > >preheader: > LOOP: >heade

Re: [PATCH GCC 6/9]Simplify control flow graph for vectorized loop

On 09/21/2016 02:52 AM, Bin.Cheng wrote: On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 5:43 PM, Jeff Law <l...@redhat.com> wrote: On 09/14/2016 07:21 AM, Richard Biener wrote: On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 8:52 PM, Bin Cheng <bin.ch...@arm.com> wrote: Hi, This is the main patch improving contro

Re: [PATCH GCC 6/9]Simplify control flow graph for vectorized loop

On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 5:43 PM, Jeff Law <l...@redhat.com> wrote: > On 09/14/2016 07:21 AM, Richard Biener wrote: >> >> On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 8:52 PM, Bin Cheng <bin.ch...@arm.com> wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> This is the main patch improving co

Re: [PATCH GCC 6/9]Simplify control flow graph for vectorized loop

On 09/14/2016 07:21 AM, Richard Biener wrote: On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 8:52 PM, Bin Cheng <bin.ch...@arm.com> wrote: Hi, This is the main patch improving control flow graph for vectorized loop. It generally rewrites loop peeling stuff in vectorizer. As described in patch, for a typica

Re: [PATCH GCC 6/9]Simplify control flow graph for vectorized loop

On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 8:52 PM, Bin Cheng <bin.ch...@arm.com> wrote: > Hi, > This is the main patch improving control flow graph for vectorized loop. It > generally rewrites loop peeling stuff in vectorizer. As described in patch, > for a typical loop to

[PATCH GCC 6/9]Simplify control flow graph for vectorized loop

Hi, This is the main patch improving control flow graph for vectorized loop. It generally rewrites loop peeling stuff in vectorizer. As described in patch, for a typical loop to be vectorized like: preheader: LOOP: header_bb: loop_body if (exit_loop_cond

[OT] Control Flow Graph(CFG) into Abstract Syntax Tree(AST)

Hi, I know most compilers go from AST to CFG. I am writing a decompiler, so I was wondering if anyone knew of any documents describing how best to get from CFG to AST. The decompiler project is open source. https://github.com/jcdutton/libbeauty The decompiler already contains a disassembler and

Re: [OT] Control Flow Graph(CFG) into Abstract Syntax Tree(AST)

thanks for sharing, will check this out. mike On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 9:05 PM, James Courtier-Dutton james.dut...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I know most compilers go from AST to CFG. I am writing a decompiler, so I was wondering if anyone knew of any documents describing how best to get from CFG

Control Flow Graph

Hi all, i must use cfg library to build and manipulate a control flow graph. I have read more but i have not found an answer to my question: It is possible to build a cfg structure directly from a file .cfg ?? How i can building a cfg from a file?? Thanks to all, lastnote

Re: Control Flow Graph

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 11/15/06 06:06: Hi all, i must use cfg library to build and manipulate a control flow graph. I have read more but i have not found an answer to my question: It is possible to build a cfg structure directly from a file .cfg ?? How i can building a cfg from a file

Re: Control Flow Graph

to manipulate. Can you help me? Thanks to all, lastnote Diego Novillo ha scritto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 11/15/06 06:06: Hi all, i must use cfg library to build and manipulate a control flow graph. I have read more but i have not found an answer to my question: It is possible to build

Re: Control Flow Graph

albino aiello wrote on 11/15/06 10:14: Thanks, but i want to use the .cfg file to construct directly a tree_cfg in C language using the TREE SSA libraries of gcc. There is no such thing as a tree ssa library. If you are adding a pass to GCC, then you already have the CFG at your disposal.