Re: Current failures on Cygwin

2008-05-03 Thread Jerry DeLisle
Janus Weil wrote: Jerry DeLisle wrote: Tim Prince wrote: I verified your report of 2 new problems (new since 2 weeks ago, the last time I could bootstrap on cygwin): use_only_1.f90 segfaults the compiler at all optimization levels. array_constructor_24.f seems to get into a non-terminating loo

Re: Current failures on Cygwin

2008-05-03 Thread Janus Weil
Jerry DeLisle wrote: Tim Prince wrote: I verified your report of 2 new problems (new since 2 weeks ago, the last time I could bootstrap on cygwin): use_only_1.f90 segfaults the compiler at all optimization levels. array_constructor_24.f seems to get into a non-terminating loop at run-time, whi

Re: Current failures on Cygwin

2008-05-03 Thread Jerry DeLisle
Tim Prince wrote: I verified your report of 2 new problems (new since 2 weeks ago, the last time I could bootstrap on cygwin): use_only_1.f90 segfaults the compiler at all optimization levels. array_constructor_24.f seems to get into a non-terminating loop at run-time, which segfaults eventual

Re: Current failures on Cygwin

2008-05-03 Thread Tim Prince
Jerry DeLisle wrote: Here are gfortran failures I am seeing on Cygwin as of a few hours ago. I noticed some of these are at -O3, implying some optimization passes at fault. IIRC nint_2.f90 and default_format_denormal_1.f90 are not new. The rest of these are fairly recent. Maybe we need a me

Current failures on Cygwin

2008-05-03 Thread Jerry DeLisle
Here are gfortran failures I am seeing on Cygwin as of a few hours ago. I noticed some of these are at -O3, implying some optimization passes at fault. IIRC nint_2.f90 and default_format_denormal_1.f90 are not new. The rest of these are fairly recent. Maybe we need a meta-bug to track these.