On 23 November 2007 23:32, Howard Chu wrote:
And it looks
like current bash on cygwin doesn't handle case/esac constructs correctly,
so e.g.
the configure script for BerkeleyDB 4.6.21 fails there.
Could you possibly send a testcase to the cygwin mailing list? We haven't
had any reports
Dave Korn wrote:
On 23 November 2007 23:32, Howard Chu wrote:
And it looks
like current bash on cygwin doesn't handle case/esac constructs correctly,
so e.g.
the configure script for BerkeleyDB 4.6.21 fails there.
Could you possibly send a testcase to the cygwin mailing list? We haven't
Ali, Muhammad wrote:
but the preliminary gcc/gfortran for mingw 64-bit mode which FX Coudert
supplied was a version of gcc-4.3.
May you can take a look at the developer project 'mingw-w64' on
sourceforge for more details.
Thanks for pointing me to the mingw-w64 sourceforge project. As Tim
On Nov 23, 2007 6:31 PM, Howard Chu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've downloaded a couple of the binary tarballs from the mingw-w64 project
page. Had a lot of trouble getting usable code out of them. I finally figured
out that I had to compile without any optimization to get anything to run.
It's
Why not read the archives of more relevant lists before posting here? I
don't know what you are driving at, nor do I think anyone here cares,
I guess my initial posting was somewhat misleading. I only mentioned
MinGW because MinGW (and Cygwin) are the only ports of gcc I know of
that work on
On Nov 22, 2007 2:55 PM, Ali, Muhammad [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I can't seem to find a concrete answer anywhere to this: does the
current version of gcc support building executables for the 64 bit
version of Windows?
I am using gcc through MinGW and using the -m64 option results in a
sorry,
Ali, Muhammad wrote:
I can't seem to find a concrete answer anywhere to this: does the
current version of gcc support building executables for the 64 bit
version of Windows?
I am using gcc through MinGW and using the -m64 option results in a
sorry, unimplemented: 64-bit mode not compiled in
