During a build attempt of gcc-20051001 and more secnt on darwin 10.8
I have discovered that apparently for some unknown reason
make_exports.pl get's called during th libstdc++ build and fails
miserably:
> libstdc++-symbol.explist || (rm -f libstdc++-symbol.explist ;
exit 1)
nm -P .libs/b
On 2005-10-02, at 23:45, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
2) Why do you think that symbol versioning is exclusive to glibc?
I don't. I look at the the results of it.
3) You can of course think that glibc is evil, but how is it related?
Oh no... I got just immersed by the GLIBCXX prefixing over there
I see more trolling than bug reporting here.
This macros get's set according to acinclude.m4 in libstdc++ for builds
which utilize the glibc. Heck? What's the purpose here? Fortunately
there is no such thing as the glibc on this system at all. Looking at
the m4 macro I can't quite see how
> > 6) Is this whining reporting significant information, for the
> > person that wants to fix the bug?
>
> Well on the system in question ppc-apple-darwin-7.8.0 the perl script
> in question simply doesn't work. Since there doesn't appear to be
> much in the way of it inside acinclude.m4 it
On 2005-10-03, at 00:26, Andrew Pinski wrote:
6) Is this whining reporting significant information, for the
person that wants to fix the bug?
Well on the system in question ppc-apple-darwin-7.8.0 the perl script
in question simply doesn't work. Since there doesn't appear to be
much in the wa
You're making a lot of terrible assumptions and drawing several
incorrect conclusions. xnu-792 is not the same as "darwin7.9.2", and
no configure script in the last 6 years should be detecting a Mac OS
X system as "ppc-apple-darwin" (it should be "powerpc-apple-darwin").
What is the output
On 2005-10-03, at 00:42, Marcin Dalecki wrote:
I'm not quite sure if this is correct since guessing the GCC
version interpretation here I would expect this to came out as:
ppc-apple-darwin7.9.2
aka: Tiger darwin 10.4.2
Trying to find out where the actual name mangling occured I have
fou
On 2005-10-03, at 00:49, Shantonu Sen wrote:
You're making a lot of terrible assumptions and drawing several
incorrect conclusions. xnu-792 is not the same as "darwin7.9.2",
and no configure script in the last 6 years should be detecting a
Mac OS X system as "ppc-apple-darwin" (it should b
On 2005-10-03, at 00:26, Andrew Pinski wrote:
This perl script works just fine for me on powerpc-darwin7.9.0 I
don't
see why are we piping the output to nm when it should be piping nm's
output to c++filt.
Also this perl script works fine on powerpc-darwin7.4.0 also.
Turns out it was rpm
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Marcin Dalecki wrote:
|
| On 2005-10-03, at 00:26, Andrew Pinski wrote:
|
|>
|> This perl script works just fine for me on powerpc-darwin7.9.0 I don't
|> see why are we piping the output to nm when it should be piping nm's
|> output to c++filt.
|>
|
On 2005-10-03, at 06:05, Peter O'Gorman wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Marcin Dalecki wrote:
|
| On 2005-10-03, at 00:26, Andrew Pinski wrote:
|
|>
|> This perl script works just fine for me on powerpc-darwin7.9.0
I don't
|> see why are we piping the output to nm when
11 matches
Mail list logo
