> You know, I've always wondered why there wasn't a lisp-family front end
> for GCC, the roots of GNU and RMS being where they are (and didn't RMS
> promise way back when to make lisp suitable for unix systems
> programming?). I'm just not connected enough to the lisp world to know
> the answer I
On Wed, Mar 29, 2006 at 05:10:25PM -0300, Rafael Espíndola wrote:
> Two friends and I have started to write a toy scheme front end.
You know, I've always wondered why there wasn't a lisp-family front end
for GCC, the roots of GNU and RMS being where they are (and didn't RMS
promise way back when
> "Dustin" == Dustin Laurence <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Dustin> The question is, which front ends are regarded as being good
Dustin> exemplars of style in GCC 4 and which are burdened with legacy
Dustin> code that shouldn't be duplicated in a new project? I gather
Dustin> that at one time t
On 3/29/06, Dustin Laurence <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm fiddling around with a GCC 4 front-end tutorial that would be more
> detailed and hands-on than anything I've found so far on the web. It's
> a bit like the blind leading the blind, but it makes me learn better and
> while I'm learning i
I'm fiddling around with a GCC 4 front-end tutorial that would be more
detailed and hands-on than anything I've found so far on the web. It's
a bit like the blind leading the blind, but it makes me learn better and
while I'm learning it I don't mind writing it up, but after I learn it
I've got bet
