On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 12:51 AM, Richard Guenther
wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 6:37 PM, Xinliang David Li wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 8:12 AM, Richard Guenther
>> wrote:
>>> On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 4:52 PM, Xinliang David Li
>>> wrote:
The gist of previous discussion is to use
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 6:37 PM, Xinliang David Li wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 8:12 AM, Richard Guenther
> wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 4:52 PM, Xinliang David Li
>> wrote:
>>> The gist of previous discussion is to use function overloading instead
>>> of exposing underlying implementa
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 8:12 AM, Richard Guenther
wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 4:52 PM, Xinliang David Li wrote:
>> The gist of previous discussion is to use function overloading instead
>> of exposing underlying implementation such as builtin_dispatch to the
>> user. This new refined proposa
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 4:52 PM, Xinliang David Li wrote:
> The gist of previous discussion is to use function overloading instead
> of exposing underlying implementation such as builtin_dispatch to the
> user. This new refined proposal has not changed in that, but is more
> elaborate on various u
The gist of previous discussion is to use function overloading instead
of exposing underlying implementation such as builtin_dispatch to the
user. This new refined proposal has not changed in that, but is more
elaborate on various use cases which has been carefully thought out.
Please be specific o
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 10:37 PM, Sriraman Tallam wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am working on supporting function multi-versioning in GCC and here
> is a write-up on its usability.
>
> Multiversioning Usability
>
>
> For a simple motivating example,
>
> int
> find_popcount(unsigned int
The specifications should apply to virtual member functions too --
though the underlying implementation for MVed virtual functions and
virtual calls can be quite different.
David
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 1:37 PM, Sriraman Tallam wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am working on supporting function multi-versioni
> * Case II - User Guided Versioning where the function bodies for each
> version differ and is provided by the user.
>
> This case pertains to multi-versioning when the source bodies of the
> two or more versions are different and are provided by the user. Here
> too, I want to use a new attribute
Hi,
I am working on supporting function multi-versioning in GCC and here
is a write-up on its usability.
Multiversioning Usability
For a simple motivating example,
int
find_popcount(unsigned int i)
{
return __builtin_popcount(i);
}
Currently, compiling this with -mpopc
