On 4/17/05, Jack Howarth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Even if there were complete g77 compatibility in g95, folks may want
to stick with the g77 version from gcc 3.4 for awhile purely for
performance reasons. In doing some test runs of the APBS
Adaptive Poisson-Boltzmann Solver program, I
Zack Weinberg wrote:
This compiler does not support all of Fortran 77 yet. We recommend
distributors continue to provide packages of g77 from GCC 3.4 for
the time being. When gfortran is considered a complete replacement
for g77 we will announce it.
We recommend distributors continue...
Branko ibej [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Zack Weinberg wrote:
This compiler does not support all of Fortran 77 yet. We recommend
distributors continue to provide packages of g77 from GCC 3.4 for
the time being. When gfortran is considered a complete replacement
for g77 we will announce
Zack Weinberg wrote:
Branko ibej [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Zack Weinberg wrote:
This compiler does not support all of Fortran 77 yet. We recommend
distributors continue to provide packages of g77 from GCC 3.4 for
the time being. When gfortran is considered a complete replacement
for g77
Even if there were complete g77 compatibility in g95, folks may want
to stick with the g77 version from gcc 3.4 for awhile purely for
performance reasons. In doing some test runs of the APBS
Adaptive Poisson-Boltzmann Solver program, I discovered that the g95
built binary runs 60% slower than
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jack Howarth) writes:
Even if there were complete g77 compatibility in g95, folks may want
to stick with the g77 version from gcc 3.4 for awhile purely for
performance reasons. In doing some test runs of the APBS
Adaptive Poisson-Boltzmann Solver program, I discovered
Mark Mitchell wrote:
Please treat the GCC 4.0 branch as frozen as of this time. All
non-documentation changes now need my explicit approval.
I'll spin prerelease bits soon.
It's a pity a couple of important gfortran bug fixes didn't make it,
but work is under way to get them applied to 4.0.1.
Toon Moene wrote:
I'm still thinking about the text to warn gfortran users for the fact
that this compiler at present doesn't cover all of Fortran 77 - and that
we assume distributors to provide access to g77 as long as that's useful.
What about
This compiler at present doesn't cover all
Eric Christopher wrote:
On Sun, 2005-04-10 at 21:13 +0200, Thomas Koenig wrote:
Toon Moene wrote:
I'm still thinking about the text to warn gfortran users for the fact
that this compiler at present doesn't cover all of Fortran 77 - and that
we assume distributors to provide access to g77 as
On Saturday 09 April 2005 9:02 am, Mark Mitchell wrote:
Please treat the GCC 4.0 branch as frozen as of this time. All
non-documentation changes now need my explicit approval.
I've reported a bug on gcc-help list, but nooone seem to be interested in.
That's really sad, because I rely on this
10 matches
Mail list logo
