Re: GCC 4.1 RC1

2006-02-27 Thread Andreas Conz
Hallo, this is now bug 26481 i have attached the build log On Mon, 27 Feb 2006, Andreas Conz wrote: > > now there is a problem building the POWER part of libstdc++ : > > -->8- > -->8- > > I a

Re: GCC 4.1 RC1

2006-02-27 Thread Andreas Conz
Thanks for the help, On Fri, 24 Feb 2006, David Edelsohn wrote: > If you are building on a 32-bit only system, you need to configure > with --disable-aix64 so that it does not try to build 64-bit libraries. > GCC currently expects to be able to run executables in all multilib modes > when b

Re: GCC 4.1 RC1

2006-02-24 Thread Perry Smith
Thanks I was mostly trying to give Andreas a way to determine what type of system he has (via kdb). On Feb 24, 2006, at 6:07 PM, David Edelsohn wrote: Perry Smith writes: Perry> You can build 64 bit libraries in 32 bit mode. You are answering a different question. AIX supports

Re: GCC 4.1 RC1

2006-02-24 Thread David Edelsohn
> Perry Smith writes: Perry> You can build 64 bit libraries in 32 bit mode. You are answering a different question. AIX supports building 64-bit executables on 32-bit systems. It does not depend on the processor. The question is about bootstrapping GCC. GCC bootstrap want

Re: GCC 4.1 RC1

2006-02-24 Thread Perry Smith
On Feb 24, 2006, at 4:34 PM, David Edelsohn wrote: Andreas Conz writes: Andreas> Hello to all and thank you for the good work, Andreas> I was trying to build GCC 4.1 RC1 on AIX 5.1 _32bit_. Andreas> The machine is not very fast and I made some mistakes in the beginning. Andrea

Re: GCC 4.1 RC1

2006-02-24 Thread David Edelsohn
>>>>> Andreas Conz writes: Andreas> Hello to all and thank you for the good work, Andreas> I was trying to build GCC 4.1 RC1 on AIX 5.1 _32bit_. Andreas> The machine is not very fast and I made some mistakes in the beginning. Andreas> Now my build stops while configur

Re: GCC 4.1 RC1

2006-02-24 Thread Andreas Conz
Hello to all and thank you for the good work, I was trying to build GCC 4.1 RC1 on AIX 5.1 _32bit_. The machine is not very fast and I made some mistakes in the beginning. Now my build stops while configuring libstdc++-v3 : -->8- check

Re: gcc 4.1 RC1 and SPEC CPU 2000

2006-02-21 Thread Janis Johnson
On Mon, Feb 20, 2006 at 08:54:49PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > I've been testing gcc-4.1 RC1 on x86-linux-gnu with SPEC CPU 2000. Have you verfied that you can build and run all of the tests without profile-directed optimizations? Several of these programs require special

Re: gcc 4.1 RC1 and SPEC CPU 2000

2006-02-20 Thread Andrew Pinski
On Feb 21, 2006, at 12:05 AM, Andrew Pinski wrote: You need the alliterative source for this test. s/alliterative/alternative/ -- Pinski

Re: gcc 4.1 RC1 and SPEC CPU 2000

2006-02-20 Thread Andrew Pinski
On Feb 20, 2006, at 11:54 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I've been testing gcc-4.1 RC1 on x86-linux-gnu with SPEC CPU 2000. Benchmark Plain compile Profile Driven Compile 168.wupwise Vt C2,Vt 172.mgrid

gcc 4.1 RC1 and SPEC CPU 2000

2006-02-20 Thread djp
Hi, I've been testing gcc-4.1 RC1 on x86-linux-gnu with SPEC CPU 2000. There are two main reasons I did this: a) gcc is used for research experimentation and many research folks rely on SPECCPU2000 b) I, in particular, need SPEC CPU 2000 to work with profile driven fee

GCC 4.1 RC1

2006-02-19 Thread Mark Mitchell
I will be spinning RC1 this morning, as previously announced. I know that there are some outstanding patches in my email, which people have requested for 4.1. I'll review those before producing RC1, and apply them to the 4.1 branch myself if appropriate; I'll still ask the original submitters to