Alexander Kabaev wrote:
On Sun, 13 May 2007 10:53:44 +0200
Andreas Schwab [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Alexander Kabaev [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The instruction below appears to be the problematic one, but I
cannot tell why:
[MMI] st8 [r16]=r17
This insn looks completely benign, I'd rather
Alexander Kabaev [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The instruction below appears to be the problematic one, but I cannot
tell why:
[MMI] st8 [r16]=r17
This insn looks completely benign, I'd rather it's the next insn that is
the problem:
chk.a.clr r14, .L1063
This is a speculation check
On Sun, 13 May 2007 10:53:44 +0200
Andreas Schwab [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Alexander Kabaev [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The instruction below appears to be the problematic one, but I
cannot tell why:
[MMI] st8 [r16]=r17
This insn looks completely benign, I'd rather it's the next insn
Hi,
for quite some time we were unable to bootstrap GCC 4.2.x version on
FreeBSD/ia64 with default -O2 optimization flags. The binaries compiler
generates are failing with SIGILL, gengtype tool being the first
victim. GCC 4.1 does not suffer from this issue and this is currently
blocking
