Re: GCC 4.2.2 Status Report

2007-09-05 Thread Joe Buck
On Wed, Sep 05, 2007 at 12:18:36PM -0400, Richard Kenner wrote: > > The files with exceptions might not be compatible with GPLv3 by themselves > > Why? I thought GPLv2 and GPLv3 are "compatible". They are not; each requires that the work as a whole be licensed the same as the individual file. H

Re: GCC 4.2.2 Status Report

2007-09-05 Thread Richard Kenner
> The files with exceptions might not be compatible with GPLv3 by themselves Why? I thought GPLv2 and GPLv3 are "compatible".

Re: GCC 4.2.2 Status Report

2007-09-05 Thread Joe Buck
Joseph S. Myers wrote: > > Apart from anything else, we are still awaiting new wording for the > > various exceptions in use so installed headers and runtime libraries can > > be converted On Wed, Sep 05, 2007 at 08:54:08AM -0700, Mark Mitchell wrote: > Personally, I don't see how that's a prob

Re: GCC 4.2.2 Status Report

2007-09-05 Thread Mark Mitchell
Joseph S. Myers wrote: > On Tue, 4 Sep 2007, Mark Mitchell wrote: > >> One critical issue: has GCC 4.2.x been fully converted to GPLv3, at this >> point? If not, we'll have to wait until that is done before we can >> release, per the FSF's instructions. > > Apart from anything else, we are still

Re: GCC 4.2.2 Status Report

2007-09-05 Thread Richard Guenther
On 9/5/07, Daniel Berlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 9/5/07, Richard Guenther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 9/5/07, Daniel Berlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On 9/4/07, Mark Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > We still have the nasty aliasing problems: > > > > > > > > P

Re: GCC 4.2.2 Status Report

2007-09-05 Thread Daniel Berlin
On 9/5/07, Richard Guenther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 9/5/07, Daniel Berlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 9/4/07, Mark Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > We still have the nasty aliasing problems: > > > > > > PR32182 [4.2 Regression] -fstrict-aliasing optimizations cause co..

Re: GCC 4.2.2 Status Report

2007-09-05 Thread Joseph S. Myers
On Tue, 4 Sep 2007, Mark Mitchell wrote: > One critical issue: has GCC 4.2.x been fully converted to GPLv3, at this > point? If not, we'll have to wait until that is done before we can > release, per the FSF's instructions. Apart from anything else, we are still awaiting new wording for the var

Re: GCC 4.2.2 Status Report

2007-09-05 Thread Richard Guenther
On 9/5/07, Daniel Berlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 9/4/07, Mark Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > We still have the nasty aliasing problems: > > > > PR32182 [4.2 Regression] -fstrict-aliasing optimizations cause co... > > It's not clear from the PR that this is either an aliasing bu

Re: GCC 4.2.2 Status Report

2007-09-04 Thread Daniel Berlin
On 9/4/07, Mark Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Summary > === > > The GCC 4.2.1 release was July 18, so our target for a 4.2.2 release is > September 18th. I plan to build RC1 this Sunday, September 9. If all > goes well, we'll have 4.2.2 out around the 18th; if not, we'll delay a > bit

GCC 4.2.2 Status Report

2007-09-04 Thread Mark Mitchell
Summary === The GCC 4.2.1 release was July 18, so our target for a 4.2.2 release is September 18th. I plan to build RC1 this Sunday, September 9. If all goes well, we'll have 4.2.2 out around the 18th; if not, we'll delay a bit from there. One critical issue: has GCC 4.2.x been fully conver