Re: GCC 4.7 Status Report for *-rtems

2011-12-19 Thread Bernd Schmidt
On 12/14/11 13:02, Henderson, Stuart wrote: bfin - REGRESSION - ICE - http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51003 This looks like a known, general issue which Bernd had a fix for, but it doesn't appear to have been checked in yet:

RE: GCC 4.7 Status Report for *-rtems

2011-12-14 Thread Henderson, Stuart
bfin - REGRESSION - ICE - http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51003 This looks like a known, general issue which Bernd had a fix for, but it doesn't appear to have been checked in yet: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-11/msg01524.html Stu

Re: GCC 4.7 Status Report for *-rtems

2011-12-14 Thread Joel Sherrill
On 12/14/2011 06:02 AM, Henderson, Stuart wrote: bfin - REGRESSION - ICE - http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51003 This looks like a known, general issue which Bernd had a fix for, but it doesn't appear to have been checked in yet:

GCC 4.7 Status Report for *-rtems

2011-12-13 Thread Joel Sherrill
Hi, From an RTEMS perspective, the head has multiple regressions from the 4.6 branch. avr, bfin, lm32 and m68k have regressions such that they are incapable of compiling a complete tool chain. This means they fail to compile gcc, newlib, or RTEMS. These are the PRs for those regressions.

Re: GCC 4.7 Status Report for *-rtems

2011-12-13 Thread Denis Chertykov
2011/12/13 Joel Sherrill joel.sherr...@oarcorp.com: Hi, From an RTEMS perspective, the head has multiple regressions from the 4.6 branch. avr, bfin, lm32 and m68k have regressions such that they are incapable of compiling a complete tool chain. This means they fail to compile gcc, newlib, or