Chris Lattner wrote:
On Apr 10, 2009, at 1:55 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
My impression is that the C++ committee generally feel that exception
specifications are a failed feature, and nobody is particularly
interested in fixing them.
Have you seen this?
http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/do
On Apr 10, 2009, at 1:55 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
My impression is that the C++ committee generally feel that
exception specifications are a failed feature, and nobody is
particularly interested in fixing them.
Hi Jason,
Have you seen this?
http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/papers
Simon Hill wrote:
C) Lastly, it would be nice if someone could indicate whether a
finished and fully functional version of this project would be likely
to make it into the mainline as I have seen requests for its
functionality many times, including on this mailing list, and it has
no downside:
-
Hi Simon
> I recently (on 18/12/2008) mailed a GCC patch to this mailing list,
> but I went on holiday after and have only just arrived back. I
> probably should have asked for some feedback then.
Thanks for taking the time to describe your work in the right amount of
detail. I think you need a
I recently (on 18/12/2008) mailed a GCC patch to this mailing list,
but I went on holiday after and have only just arrived back. I
probably should have asked for some feedback then.
The patch is for the C++ component of GCC. It adds some compiler
warning options. The primary usage of these options
