Re: GCC mini-summit - benchmarks

2007-04-23 Thread Steve Ellcey
Jim Wilson wrote: Kenneth Hoste wrote: I'm not sure what 'tests' mean here... Are test cases being extracted from the SPEC CPU2006 sources? Or are you refering to the validity tests of the SPEC framework itself (to check whether the output generated by some binary conforms with their

Re: GCC mini-summit - benchmarks

2007-04-23 Thread H. J. Lu
On Mon, Apr 23, 2007 at 09:49:04AM -0700, Steve Ellcey wrote: Jim Wilson wrote: Kenneth Hoste wrote: I'm not sure what 'tests' mean here... Are test cases being extracted from the SPEC CPU2006 sources? Or are you refering to the validity tests of the SPEC framework itself (to check

Re: GCC mini-summit - benchmarks

2007-04-21 Thread Jim Wilson
Kenneth Hoste wrote: I'm not sure what 'tests' mean here... Are test cases being extracted from the SPEC CPU2006 sources? Or are you refering to the validity tests of the SPEC framework itself (to check whether the output generated by some binary conforms with their reference output)? The

Re: GCC mini-summit - benchmarks

2007-04-20 Thread Kenneth Hoste
On 20 Apr 2007, at 08:30, Ian Lance Taylor wrote: 11) H.J. Lu discussed SPEC CPU 2006. He reported that a couple of the tests do not run successfully, and it appears to be due to bugs in the tests which cause gcc to compile them in unexpected ways. He has been reporting the