Tomasz Borowik writes:
> The most beneficial task (for me) would be to just bring the front-end
> I've already written up to mainline quality (though not necessarily
> inclusion), and in the process update some of the documentation or
> maybe even cleanup some gcc code.
I have nothing against ne
On Mon, 19 Mar 2012 13:26:00 +
Andrew Haley wrote:
> On 03/18/2012 11:53 PM, Tomasz Borowik wrote:
>
> > The perfect solution would be to shun away the standard model and
> > actually support a kind of on-demand recompilation where the editor
> > tells the compiler (running in background) wh
On 03/18/2012 11:53 PM, Tomasz Borowik wrote:
> The perfect solution would be to shun away the standard model and
> actually support a kind of on-demand recompilation where the editor
> tells the compiler (running in background) what has changed and the
> compiler (having a function inlining map)
I'm sending the email again as my connection seems to be having strange issues
and it doesn't look like it got through the first time (hope it doesn't get
duplicated).
Hello everyone,
I'm thinking of applying for GSoC, and I've got three main ideas for gcc based
around my project.
I've been w
