Re: Gcc as callable libraries (was: removing toxic emailers)

2021-04-15 Thread David Malcolm via Gcc
On Thu, 2021-04-15 at 17:31 -0400, David Malcolm via Gcc wrote: > On Thu, 2021-04-15 at 21:48 +0200, Thomas Koenig wrote: [...snip...] > >  > Perhaps a pronouncement like: "try to make everything be > > consumable as > >  > libraries with APIs, as well as as standalone binaries" might > > have >

Re: Gcc as callable libraries (was: removing toxic emailers)

2021-04-15 Thread David Malcolm via Gcc
On Thu, 2021-04-15 at 21:48 +0200, Thomas Koenig wrote: > David, > > for some reason or other, I did not get your mail, so I will > just reply copying in from the archive. > > First, thanks for injecting some sanity into the discussion. Thanks Thomas > I will not discuss RMS' personal

Re: Gcc as callable libraries (was: removing toxic emailers)

2021-04-15 Thread David Edelsohn via Gcc
On Thu, Apr 15, 2021 at 5:04 PM Thomas Koenig via Gcc wrote: > > David, > > for some reason or other, I did not get your mail, so I will > just reply copying in from the archive. > > First, thanks for injecting some sanity into the discussion. > > I will not discuss RMS' personal shortcomings or

Gcc as callable libraries (was: removing toxic emailers)

2021-04-15 Thread Thomas Koenig via Gcc
David, for some reason or other, I did not get your mail, so I will just reply copying in from the archive. First, thanks for injecting some sanity into the discussion. I will not discuss RMS' personal shortcomings or the lack of them. In today's toxic political climate, such allegations are