Re: Help needed with maintainer-mode

2024-03-06 Thread Richard Earnshaw (lists) via Gcc
On 06/03/2024 15:04, Andrew Carlotti via Gcc wrote: > On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 06:39:54PM +0100, Christophe Lyon via Gcc wrote: >> On Thu, 29 Feb 2024 at 12:00, Mark Wielaard wrote: >>> >>> Hi Christophe, >>> >>> On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 11:22:33AM +0100, Christophe Lyon via Gcc wrote: I've not

Re: Help needed with maintainer-mode

2024-03-06 Thread Andrew Carlotti via Gcc
On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 06:39:54PM +0100, Christophe Lyon via Gcc wrote: > On Thu, 29 Feb 2024 at 12:00, Mark Wielaard wrote: > > > > Hi Christophe, > > > > On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 11:22:33AM +0100, Christophe Lyon via Gcc wrote: > > > I've noticed that sourceware's buildbot has a small script > >

Re: Help needed with maintainer-mode

2024-03-05 Thread Richard Earnshaw via Gcc
On 05/03/2024 14:26, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote: > On 04/03/2024 20:04, Jonathan Wakely wrote: >> On Mon, 4 Mar 2024 at 19:27, Vladimir Mezentsev >> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> On 3/4/24 09:38, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote: Tools like git (and svn before it) don't try to maintain time-sta

Re: Help needed with maintainer-mode

2024-03-05 Thread Richard Earnshaw (lists) via Gcc
On 04/03/2024 20:04, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > On Mon, 4 Mar 2024 at 19:27, Vladimir Mezentsev > wrote: >> >> >> >> On 3/4/24 09:38, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote: >>> Tools like git (and svn before it) don't try to maintain time-stamps on >>> patches, the tool just modifies the file and the time

Re: Help needed with maintainer-mode

2024-03-04 Thread Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
On Mon, 4 Mar 2024 at 19:27, Vladimir Mezentsev wrote: > > > > On 3/4/24 09:38, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote: > > Tools like git (and svn before it) don't try to maintain time-stamps on > > patches, the tool just modifies the file and the timestamp comes from the > > time of the modification.

Re: Help needed with maintainer-mode

2024-03-04 Thread Vladimir Mezentsev via Gcc
On 3/4/24 09:38, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote: Tools like git (and svn before it) don't try to maintain time-stamps on patches, the tool just modifies the file and the timestamp comes from the time of the modification. That's fine if there is nothing regenerated within the repository (it

Re: Help needed with maintainer-mode

2024-03-04 Thread Richard Earnshaw (lists) via Gcc
On 04/03/2024 16:42, Christophe Lyon wrote: > On Mon, 4 Mar 2024 at 16:41, Richard Earnshaw > wrote: >> >> >> >> On 04/03/2024 15:36, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote: >> > On 04/03/2024 14:46, Christophe Lyon via Gcc wrote: >> >> On Mon, 4 Mar 2024 at 12:25, Jonathan Wakely >> >> wrote: >> >>> >

Re: Help needed with maintainer-mode

2024-03-04 Thread Christophe Lyon via Gcc
On Mon, 4 Mar 2024 at 16:41, Richard Earnshaw wrote: > > > > On 04/03/2024 15:36, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote: > > On 04/03/2024 14:46, Christophe Lyon via Gcc wrote: > >> On Mon, 4 Mar 2024 at 12:25, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > >>> > >>> On Mon, 4 Mar 2024 at 10:44, Christophe Lyon via Gcc > >

Re: Help needed with maintainer-mode

2024-03-04 Thread Richard Earnshaw via Gcc
On 04/03/2024 15:36, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote: > On 04/03/2024 14:46, Christophe Lyon via Gcc wrote: >> On Mon, 4 Mar 2024 at 12:25, Jonathan Wakely wrote: >>> >>> On Mon, 4 Mar 2024 at 10:44, Christophe Lyon via Gcc >>> wrote: Hi! On Mon, 4 Mar 2024 at 10:36, Thomas

Re: Help needed with maintainer-mode

2024-03-04 Thread Richard Earnshaw (lists) via Gcc
On 04/03/2024 14:46, Christophe Lyon via Gcc wrote: > On Mon, 4 Mar 2024 at 12:25, Jonathan Wakely wrote: >> >> On Mon, 4 Mar 2024 at 10:44, Christophe Lyon via Gcc wrote: >>> >>> Hi! >>> >>> On Mon, 4 Mar 2024 at 10:36, Thomas Schwinge wrote: Hi! On 2024-03-04T00:30:05+,

Re: Help needed with maintainer-mode

2024-03-04 Thread Christophe Lyon via Gcc
On Mon, 4 Mar 2024 at 12:25, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > > On Mon, 4 Mar 2024 at 10:44, Christophe Lyon via Gcc wrote: > > > > Hi! > > > > On Mon, 4 Mar 2024 at 10:36, Thomas Schwinge wrote: > > > > > > Hi! > > > > > > On 2024-03-04T00:30:05+, Sam James wrote: > > > > Mark Wielaard writes: >

Re: Help needed with maintainer-mode

2024-03-04 Thread Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
On Mon, 4 Mar 2024 at 10:44, Christophe Lyon via Gcc wrote: > > Hi! > > On Mon, 4 Mar 2024 at 10:36, Thomas Schwinge wrote: > > > > Hi! > > > > On 2024-03-04T00:30:05+, Sam James wrote: > > > Mark Wielaard writes: > > >> On Fri, Mar 01, 2024 at 05:32:15PM +0100, Christophe Lyon wrote: > > >

Re: Help needed with maintainer-mode

2024-03-04 Thread Christophe Lyon via Gcc
Hi! On Mon, 4 Mar 2024 at 10:36, Thomas Schwinge wrote: > > Hi! > > On 2024-03-04T00:30:05+, Sam James wrote: > > Mark Wielaard writes: > >> On Fri, Mar 01, 2024 at 05:32:15PM +0100, Christophe Lyon wrote: > >>> [...], I read > >>> https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/Regenerating_GCC_Configuration > >

Re: Help needed with maintainer-mode

2024-03-04 Thread Thomas Schwinge
Hi! On 2024-03-04T00:30:05+, Sam James wrote: > Mark Wielaard writes: >> On Fri, Mar 01, 2024 at 05:32:15PM +0100, Christophe Lyon wrote: >>> [...], I read >>> https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/Regenerating_GCC_Configuration >>> which basically says "run autoreconf in every dir where there is a >>> c

Re: Help needed with maintainer-mode

2024-03-03 Thread Sam James via Gcc
Mark Wielaard writes: > Hi Christophe, Hi Mark, Christophe, et. al, > > On Fri, Mar 01, 2024 at 05:32:15PM +0100, Christophe Lyon wrote: >> > > > And it was indeed done this way because that way the files are >> > > > regenerated in a reproducible way. Which wasn't the case when using >> > > >

Re: Help needed with maintainer-mode

2024-03-03 Thread Mark Wielaard
Hi Christophe, On Fri, Mar 01, 2024 at 05:32:15PM +0100, Christophe Lyon wrote: > > > > And it was indeed done this way because that way the files are > > > > regenerated in a reproducible way. Which wasn't the case when using > > > > --enable-maintainer-mode (and autoreconfig also doesn't work).

Re: Help needed with maintainer-mode

2024-03-01 Thread Christophe Lyon via Gcc
On Fri, 1 Mar 2024 at 14:08, Mark Wielaard wrote: > > Hi Christophe, > > On Thu, 2024-02-29 at 18:39 +0100, Christophe Lyon wrote: > > On Thu, 29 Feb 2024 at 12:00, Mark Wielaard wrote: > > > That python script works across gcc/binutils/gdb: > > > https://sourceware.org/cgit/builder/tree/builder/

Re: Help needed with maintainer-mode

2024-03-01 Thread Christophe Lyon via Gcc
On Fri, 1 Mar 2024 at 14:08, Mark Wielaard wrote: > > Hi Christophe, > > On Thu, 2024-02-29 at 18:39 +0100, Christophe Lyon wrote: > > On Thu, 29 Feb 2024 at 12:00, Mark Wielaard wrote: > > > That python script works across gcc/binutils/gdb: > > > https://sourceware.org/cgit/builder/tree/builder/

Re: Help needed with maintainer-mode

2024-03-01 Thread Mark Wielaard
Hi Christophe, On Thu, 2024-02-29 at 18:39 +0100, Christophe Lyon wrote: > On Thu, 29 Feb 2024 at 12:00, Mark Wielaard wrote: > > That python script works across gcc/binutils/gdb: > > https://sourceware.org/cgit/builder/tree/builder/containers/autoregen.py > > > > It is installed into a containe

Re: Help needed with maintainer-mode

2024-03-01 Thread Christophe Lyon via Gcc
On Thu, 29 Feb 2024 at 20:49, Thiago Jung Bauermann wrote: > > > Hello, > > Christophe Lyon writes: > > > I hoped improving this would be as simple as adding > > --enable-maintainer-mode when configuring, after making sure > > autoconf-2.69 and automake-1.15.1 were in the PATH (using our host's >

Re: Help needed with maintainer-mode

2024-02-29 Thread Thiago Jung Bauermann via Gcc
Hello, Christophe Lyon writes: > I hoped improving this would be as simple as adding > --enable-maintainer-mode when configuring, after making sure > autoconf-2.69 and automake-1.15.1 were in the PATH (using our host's > libtool and gettext seems OK). > > However, doing so triggered several pr

Re: Help needed with maintainer-mode

2024-02-29 Thread Christophe Lyon via Gcc
On Thu, 29 Feb 2024 at 12:00, Mark Wielaard wrote: > > Hi Christophe, > > On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 11:22:33AM +0100, Christophe Lyon via Gcc wrote: > > I've noticed that sourceware's buildbot has a small script > > "autoregen.py" which does not use the project's build system, but > > rather calls a

Re: Help needed with maintainer-mode

2024-02-29 Thread Christophe Lyon via Gcc
On Thu, 29 Feb 2024 at 11:41, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote: > > On 29/02/2024 10:22, Christophe Lyon via Gcc wrote: > > Hi! > > > > Sorry for cross-posting, but I'm not sure the rules/guidelines are the > > same in gcc vs binutils/gdb. > > > > TL;DR: are there some guidelines about how to use/en

Re: Help needed with maintainer-mode

2024-02-29 Thread Mark Wielaard
Hi Christophe, On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 11:22:33AM +0100, Christophe Lyon via Gcc wrote: > I've noticed that sourceware's buildbot has a small script > "autoregen.py" which does not use the project's build system, but > rather calls aclocal/autoheader/automake/autoconf in an ad-hoc way. > Should we

Re: Help needed with maintainer-mode

2024-02-29 Thread Richard Earnshaw (lists) via Gcc
On 29/02/2024 10:22, Christophe Lyon via Gcc wrote: > Hi! > > Sorry for cross-posting, but I'm not sure the rules/guidelines are the > same in gcc vs binutils/gdb. > > TL;DR: are there some guidelines about how to use/enable maintainer-mode? > > In the context of the Linaro CI, I've been looking

Help needed with maintainer-mode

2024-02-29 Thread Christophe Lyon via Gcc
Hi! Sorry for cross-posting, but I'm not sure the rules/guidelines are the same in gcc vs binutils/gdb. TL;DR: are there some guidelines about how to use/enable maintainer-mode? In the context of the Linaro CI, I've been looking at enabling maintainer-mode at configure time in our configurations