Re: Integration of transactional memory support into a data-flow extension of OpenMP

2011-05-09 Thread ismail
On Fri, 2011-05-06 at 17:51 +0200, Patrick Marlier wrote: >>>Dear Patrick, >>> I am currently searching for a pipeline in a TM-Benchmarks but I can >>>not overlap the concept of transactions with pipeline in current TM >>>benchmarks. I think I will write a new one. > Dear Ismail, > > On Fri, 6 Ma

Re: Integration of transactional memory support into a data-flow extension of OpenMP

2011-05-06 Thread Patrick Marlier
Dear Ismail, On Fri, 6 May 2011, ismail wrote: TinySTM 1.0 uses implicit transaction descriptor by default (same as 0.9.9) but you can compile it with EXPLICIT_TX_PARAMETER (Makefile) and then the transaction descriptor is explicit. But functions are the same from 0.9.9 to 1.0.0 so I don't reall

Re: Integration of transactional memory support into a data-flow extension of OpenMP

2011-05-05 Thread ismail
On Wed, 2011-05-04 at 12:03 +0200, Patrick Marlier wrote: ---Sorry for the late response. > Dear Ismail, > > On 05/03/2011 11:18 PM, ismail wrote: > >> ++ First of all, MEMCPY and MEMSET functions do not include any > >> transaction identifier (id) and transactions inside the LeeTM fails > >> d

Re: Integration of transactional memory support into a data-flow extension of OpenMP

2011-05-04 Thread Patrick Marlier
Dear Ismail, On 05/03/2011 11:18 PM, ismail wrote: >> ++ First of all, MEMCPY and MEMSET functions do not include any >> transaction identifier (id) and transactions inside the LeeTM fails >> during transactional access to the memory. I think this case is also >> for tinySTM-0.9.9 and tinySTM-1.0

Re: Integration of transactional memory support into a data-flow extension of OpenMP

2011-05-03 Thread ismail
On Tue, 2011-05-03 at 23:09 +0200, ismail kuru wrote: > > > On 3 May 2011 17:02, Patrick Marlier wrote: > Hi Ismail! > > > My study mainly focuses on integration of > transactional memory support > into data-flow extension

Re: Integration of transactional memory support into a data-flow extension of OpenMP

2011-05-03 Thread Patrick Marlier
Hi Ismail! My study mainly focuses on integration of transactional memory support into data-flow extension of OpenMP that is aiming increased expressiveness and performance while preserving the paradigms' properties. I am really happy to see people working with transactional memory. I will tr

Integration of transactional memory support into a data-flow extension of OpenMP

2011-04-29 Thread ismail
Hi, I have thought that my first email can be seen as too long. I have done experiments regarding compatibility of OpenMP pramas + trans-mem constructs. (It is fine, working. I have a primitive interface (combined constructs of trans-mem and OpenMP)) Any suggestions for benchmarks would be gr

Integration of transactional memory support into a data-flow extension of OpenMP

2011-04-28 Thread ismail
Hi, I am Ismail KURU, accepted by Google Summer of Code 2011. My study mainly focuses on integration of transactional memory support into data-flow extension of OpenMP that is aiming increased expressiveness and performance while preserving the paradigms' properties. My project combines develo