Re: Is compare no longer enabled by default?

2007-02-12 Thread H. J. Lu
On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 09:53:00AM -0800, Joe Buck wrote: > On Sun, Feb 11, 2007 at 01:04:05PM -0800, H. J. Lu wrote: > > On Sun, Feb 11, 2007 at 01:00:41PM -0800, H. J. Lu wrote: > > > "make bootstrap" used to compare stage2 and stage3 after gcc was > > > bootstrapped. "make bootstrap" would abort

Re: Is compare no longer enabled by default?

2007-02-12 Thread Joe Buck
On Sun, Feb 11, 2007 at 01:04:05PM -0800, H. J. Lu wrote: > On Sun, Feb 11, 2007 at 01:00:41PM -0800, H. J. Lu wrote: > > "make bootstrap" used to compare stage2 and stage3 after gcc was > > bootstrapped. "make bootstrap" would abort if comparison was failed. > > Now, compare stage2 and stage3 is n

Re: Is compare no longer enabled by default?

2007-02-11 Thread Andreas Schwab
"H. J. Lu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Now, compare stage2 and stage3 is not longer done for > "make bootstrap". Since when? Works fine for me. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, [EMAIL PROTECTED] SuSE Linux Products GmbH, Maxfeldstraße 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany PGP key fingerprint = 5

Re: Is compare no longer enabled by default?

2007-02-11 Thread H. J. Lu
On Sun, Feb 11, 2007 at 01:00:41PM -0800, H. J. Lu wrote: > "make bootstrap" used to compare stage2 and stage3 after gcc was > bootstrapped. "make bootstrap" would abort if comparison was failed. > Now, compare stage2 and stage3 is not longer done for > "make bootstrap". Is that intentional? I thi

Is compare no longer enabled by default?

2007-02-11 Thread H. J. Lu
"make bootstrap" used to compare stage2 and stage3 after gcc was bootstrapped. "make bootstrap" would abort if comparison was failed. Now, compare stage2 and stage3 is not longer done for "make bootstrap". Is that intentional? I think it is a very bad idea. H.J.