> There is an upsteam for beohm_gc (Boehm himself).
Yes, but you usually can modify the local copy and simply CC Hans.
--
Eric Botcazou
>
> Andrew Haley wrote:
> > Bernd Schmidt writes:
>
> > > Hmm, we can trap null pointer accesses, but I don't think we deliver
> > > reliable SIGSEGV signals yet or provide a means of getting the faulting
> > > address. If that was fixed, is there anything obvious that stands in
> > > the
Andrew Haley wrote:
Bernd Schmidt writes:
> Hmm, we can trap null pointer accesses, but I don't think we deliver
> reliable SIGSEGV signals yet or provide a means of getting the faulting
> address. If that was fixed, is there anything obvious that stands in
> the way of a uClinux/uClibc
Tom Tromey writes:
> > "Andrew" == Andrew Haley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Bernd> Speaking of which, has anyone ported gcj to a MMU-less uClinux
> Bernd> platform yet?
>
> Andrew> It's impossible with the current config. This is because some of
> Andrew> libgcj is written on C++,
> "Andrew" == Andrew Haley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Bernd> Speaking of which, has anyone ported gcj to a MMU-less uClinux
Bernd> platform yet?
Andrew> It's impossible with the current config. This is because some of
Andrew> libgcj is written on C++, and the C++ compiler FE does not insert
Bernd Schmidt writes:
> Andrew Haley wrote:
> > Bernd Schmidt writes:
> > > David Daney wrote:
> > > > Perhaps not in general, but one unstated premise of this whole thread
> > is
> > > > that for some GCC targets (most Unix like operating systems) you
> > *can*
> > > > count on a S
Andrew Haley wrote:
Bernd Schmidt writes:
> David Daney wrote:
> > Perhaps not in general, but one unstated premise of this whole thread is
> > that for some GCC targets (most Unix like operating systems) you *can*
> > count on a SIGSEGV when you dereference a null pointer. The java front
Bernd Schmidt writes:
> David Daney wrote:
> > Perhaps not in general, but one unstated premise of this whole thread is
> > that for some GCC targets (most Unix like operating systems) you *can*
> > count on a SIGSEGV when you dereference a null pointer. The java front
> > end takes advant
David Daney wrote:
Perhaps not in general, but one unstated premise of this whole thread is
that for some GCC targets (most Unix like operating systems) you *can*
count on a SIGSEGV when you dereference a null pointer. The java front
end takes advantage of this fact to eliminate explicit check
