On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 10:57 AM, Richard Guenther
richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes - that would be basically a linker plugin without plugin support.
And I'd go even further and have LD provide a complete symbol
resolution set like we get from the gold linker-plugin.
That wouldn't help
On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 11:19 AM, Steven Bosscher stevenb@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 10:57 AM, Richard Guenther
richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes - that would be basically a linker plugin without plugin support.
And I'd go even further and have LD provide a complete
Well, we'd then need to re-architect the symbol merging and
LTO unit read-in to properly honor linking semantics (drop
a LTO unit from an archive if it doesn't resolve any unresolved
symbols). I don't know how easy that will be, but it shouldn't
be impossible at least.
We also should keep
Richard Guenther richard.guent...@gmail.com writes:
Well, we'd then need to re-architect the symbol merging and
LTO unit read-in to properly honor linking semantics (drop
a LTO unit from an archive if it doesn't resolve any unresolved
symbols). I don't know how easy that will be, but it
2010/4/29 Jan Hubicka hubi...@ucw.cz:
Well, we'd then need to re-architect the symbol merging and
LTO unit read-in to properly honor linking semantics (drop
a LTO unit from an archive if it doesn't resolve any unresolved
symbols). I don't know how easy that will be, but it shouldn't
be
2010/4/29 Jan Hubicka hubi...@ucw.cz:
Well, we'd then need to re-architect the symbol merging and
LTO unit read-in to properly honor linking semantics (drop
a LTO unit from an archive if it doesn't resolve any unresolved
symbols). I don't know how easy that will be, but it shouldn't
be
