Hi,
in March 2004 we added to many libstdc++-v3 testcases lines similar to
#if !__GXX_WEAK__ && _MT_ALLOCATOR_H
// Explicitly instantiate for systems with no COMDAT or weak support.
template class __gnu_cxx::__mt_alloc >;
#endif
AFAIK, only in order to avoid spurious failures on darwin.
I'd like to
Paolo Carlini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
>
> in March 2004 we added to many libstdc++-v3 testcases lines similar to
>
> #if !__GXX_WEAK__ && _MT_ALLOCATOR_H
> // Explicitly instantiate for systems with no COMDAT or weak support.
> template class __gnu_cxx::__mt_alloc >;
> #endif
>
> AFAI
Geoffrey Keating wrote:
Darwin now has weak/comdat support, so it doesn't need or use this any more.
Ah, great, I suspected that...
However, AIX does need them, I think.
Humpf, forgot AIX! David Edelsohn?!?
Thanks,
Paolo.
On Mar 15, 2005, at 7:35 PM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
Geoffrey Keating wrote:
Darwin now has weak/comdat support, so it doesn't need or use this
any more.
Ah, great, I suspected that...
However, AIX does need them, I think.
Humpf, forgot AIX! David Edelsohn?!?
There are other targets other than aix t
Andrew Pinski wrote:
There are other targets other than aix that still need them too.
Almost all non elf targets (and there might be some elf targets too).
AIX 5.1 supports weak symbols (IIRC) and should work without the "hack"
but older AIX still should be supported.
Thanks Andrew for the info. Wh
On Mar 15, 2005, at 8:01 PM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
Andrew Pinski wrote:
There are other targets other than aix that still need them too.
Almost all non elf targets (and there might be some elf targets too).
AIX 5.1 supports weak symbols (IIRC) and should work without the
"hack"
but older AIX still
> Paolo Carlini writes:
>> However, AIX does need them, I think.
>>
Paolo> Humpf, forgot AIX! David Edelsohn?!?
AIX probably needs this support indefinitely. If I remember
correctly, the new allocator does not work on AIX due to ELF-like
assumptions about the order of global constru
> I'd like to know from the maintainers (or other knowledgeable people)
> which is the current situation, whether those explicit instantiations
> are still needed. I'm asking because I mean to move from v7 to mainline
> a bunch of similar testcases...
I think you should kill these bits, for a
Benjamin Kosnik wrote:
I'd like to know from the maintainers (or other knowledgeable people)
which is the current situation, whether those explicit instantiations
are still needed. I'm asking because I mean to move from v7 to mainline
a bunch of similar testcases...
I think you should kill
