Re: Major bootstrap time regression on March 30

2005-04-11 Thread James E Wilson
On Fri, 2005-04-08 at 16:36, Daniel Berlin wrote: Jim works on a insert details here machine: Athlon64 3400+, with 1GB main memory, running SuSE 9.1 x86_64-linux.

Re: Major bootstrap time regression on March 30

2005-04-09 Thread Laurent GUERBY
On Thu, 2005-04-07 at 17:57 -0700, James E Wilson wrote: On Thu, 2005-04-07 at 17:34, Diego Novillo wrote: Another thing, has our library code base (libjava, libstdc++) grown significantly lately? I was doing full builds, except for Ada. I should have mentioned that. Ada doesn't get

Re: Major bootstrap time regression on March 30

2005-04-08 Thread Arnaud Charlet
I was doing full builds, except for Ada. I should have mentioned that. Ada doesn't get configured by default, and I haven't bothered to check why. I probably forgot to install the Ada compiler package. Ada is not enabled by default, you need to include it explicitely, e.g.

Re: Major bootstrap time regression on March 30

2005-04-08 Thread Frank Ch. Eigler
dnovillo wrote: [...] I rebooted the machine into a new kernel on 2005-03-31 (2.6.10-1.770_FC3). The slowdown coincided with the box being rebooted into the new kernel: [...] 2005-03-305,704 -- 2.6.10-1.760_FC3 2005-03-317,026 -- 2.6.10-1.770_FC3 [...] I'm

Re: Major bootstrap time regression on March 30

2005-04-08 Thread Diego Novillo
On Thu, Apr 07, 2005 at 08:34:01PM -0400, Diego Novillo wrote: I'm rebooting the machine into the previous kernel right now to see if it changes things. Tomorrow's run will use kernel 2.6.10-1.760_FC3. Well, it seem that the kernel had nothing to do with the problem. Today's bootstrap time

Re: Major bootstrap time regression on March 30

2005-04-08 Thread Steven Bosscher
On Saturday 09 April 2005 00:32, Diego Novillo wrote: On Thu, Apr 07, 2005 at 08:34:01PM -0400, Diego Novillo wrote: I'm rebooting the machine into the previous kernel right now to see if it changes things. Tomorrow's run will use kernel 2.6.10-1.760_FC3. Well, it seem that the kernel

Re: Major bootstrap time regression on March 30

2005-04-08 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
On Sat, Apr 09, 2005 at 12:35:47AM +0200, Steven Bosscher wrote: On Saturday 09 April 2005 00:32, Diego Novillo wrote: On Thu, Apr 07, 2005 at 08:34:01PM -0400, Diego Novillo wrote: I'm rebooting the machine into the previous kernel right now to see if it changes things. Tomorrow's run

Re: Major bootstrap time regression on March 30

2005-04-08 Thread Daniel Berlin
On Fri, 2005-04-08 at 18:48 -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: On Sat, Apr 09, 2005 at 12:35:47AM +0200, Steven Bosscher wrote: On Saturday 09 April 2005 00:32, Diego Novillo wrote: On Thu, Apr 07, 2005 at 08:34:01PM -0400, Diego Novillo wrote: I'm rebooting the machine into the previous

Re: Major bootstrap time regression on March 30

2005-04-07 Thread James E Wilson
Steven Bosscher wrote: We have a bootstrap time regression since March 30. Bootstrap times on Diego Novillo's SPEC box went up from (an already high) 5500s to almost 8000s I tried looking at this, but I haven't been able to find any bootstrap time regressions. I've got a mainline tree checked

Re: Major bootstrap time regression on March 30

2005-04-07 Thread Diego Novillo
On Thu, Apr 07, 2005 at 03:08:50PM -0700, James E Wilson wrote: Is it possible that something changed on Diego's machine? Such as a new binutils, or a new kernel, etc? Yes. I rebooted the machine into a new kernel on 2005-03-31 (2.6.10-1.770_FC3). The slowdown coincided with the box being

Re: Major bootstrap time regression on March 30

2005-04-04 Thread Daniel Berlin
On Mon, 2005-04-04 at 22:49 +0200, Steven Bosscher wrote: Hi, We have a bootstrap time regression since March 30. Bootstrap times on Diego Novillo's SPEC box went up from (an already high) 5500s to almost 8000s, see: