Re: Need help to correct vla-dealloc testcase

2009-12-06 Thread Andrew Hutchinson
Thanks I am submitting patch to drop count to 10,000 for 16 bit int target. Using 32 bit counter of 1 million takes a minute or so on simulator - which is high. The lower count is quick and only requires a (16bit) stack limit to be lower than 10MB - which is pretty safe. Andy Joseph S. My

Re: Need help to correct vla-dealloc testcase

2009-12-06 Thread Joseph S. Myers
On Sun, 6 Dec 2009, Andrew Hutchinson wrote: > The test appears to be unsafe. The original fault was failure to deallocate > VLA on the jump - thus with the fault present the test would appear to perform > 1 million new allocation - and fail presumably due to either execution time or > run time er

Need help to correct vla-dealloc testcase

2009-12-06 Thread Andrew Hutchinson
I need advise before I submit pathc to fix the test gcc-torture/execute/vla-dealloc-1.c (attached below) The test appears to be unsafe. The original fault was failure to deallocate VLA on the jump - thus with the fault present the test would appear to perform 1 million new allocation - and fa