Re: Non-bootstrap build status reports

2005-03-14 Thread Janis Johnson
On Sat, Mar 12, 2005 at 11:55:03PM -0600, Aaron W. LaFramboise wrote: > Is there a reason why non-bootstrap build status reports are not > archived? For example, for the many targets that are only used in cross > configurations, it would be nice to see if they are working. First of

Re: Non-bootstrap build status reports

2005-03-13 Thread Andrew Pinski
On Mar 13, 2005, at 12:55 AM, Aaron W. LaFramboise wrote: Also, it might be nice to have a record of negative build reports. For instance, the build status page might have section for negative builds listing reports of failed builds that might serve as a quick means to determine the health of a br

Non-bootstrap build status reports

2005-03-12 Thread Aaron W. LaFramboise
Is there a reason why non-bootstrap build status reports are not archived? For example, for the many targets that are only used in cross configurations, it would be nice to see if they are working. Also, it might be nice to have a record of negative build reports. For instance, the build status