> Zero is completely acceptable for a null pointer constant in all
> circumstances *except* when passing to a varargs function, which can go
> badly wrong on platforms where the sizeof a pointer is larger than the
> sizeof an int.
This is a serious loophole on such platforms, since the com
On 3/13/07, Dave Korn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 13 March 2007 13:52, Paulo J. Matos wrote:
> Hello,
>
> When programming, due to my journeys through C++ recently, I've been
> using 0 instead of NULL. Strangely gcc compilation doesn't warn me
> about it. Is it ok to do this? (So far, I had no
On 13 March 2007 13:52, Paulo J. Matos wrote:
> Hello,
>
> When programming, due to my journeys through C++ recently, I've been
> using 0 instead of NULL. Strangely gcc compilation doesn't warn me
> about it. Is it ok to do this? (So far, I had no problems). Is there
> anything I should be aware
Hello,
When programming, due to my journeys through C++ recently, I've been
using 0 instead of NULL. Strangely gcc compilation doesn't warn me
about it. Is it ok to do this? (So far, I had no problems). Is there
anything I should be aware when using 0 instead of NULL in gcc code?
Cheers,
--
Pau
