Re: PING SC members [was RE: RFA: GCC 4.2.1: Stabalizing coalesce_list's qsort]

2007-09-28 Thread Geoffrey Keating
Dave Korn [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On 23 August 2007 22:34, Mark Mitchell wrote: I do think that generating the same code, independent of host system, is a very important property of GCC's design, just like generating the same code independent of whether or not we're compiling with -g.

Re: PING SC members [was RE: RFA: GCC 4.2.1: Stabalizing coalesce_list's qsort]

2007-09-16 Thread Gerald Pfeifer
On Tue, 28 Aug 2007, Mark Mitchell wrote: Dave Korn wrote: I do think that generating the same code, independent of host system, is a very important property of GCC's design, just like generating the same code independent of whether or not we're compiling with -g. Can the SC please consider

RE: PING SC members [was RE: RFA: GCC 4.2.1: Stabalizing coalesce_list's qsort]

2007-09-16 Thread Dave Korn
On 17 September 2007 00:28, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: On Tue, 28 Aug 2007, Mark Mitchell wrote: Dave Korn wrote: I do think that generating the same code, independent of host system, is a very important property of GCC's design, just like generating the same code independent of whether or not

Re: PING SC members [was RE: RFA: GCC 4.2.1: Stabalizing coalesce_list's qsort]

2007-08-28 Thread Mark Mitchell
Dave Korn wrote: On 23 August 2007 22:34, Mark Mitchell wrote: I do think that generating the same code, independent of host system, is a very important property of GCC's design, just like generating the same code independent of whether or not we're compiling with -g. Hear, hear.

PING SC members [was RE: RFA: GCC 4.2.1: Stabalizing coalesce_list's qsort]

2007-08-27 Thread Dave Korn
On 23 August 2007 22:34, Mark Mitchell wrote: I do think that generating the same code, independent of host system, is a very important property of GCC's design, just like generating the same code independent of whether or not we're compiling with -g. Hear, hear. I've always thought