Andrew --
I'm trying to firm up GCC 4.3 planning a bit. One of the things I'm
considering is whether or not the POINTER_PLUS branch should be merged
as part of 4.3. My understanding from looking at your emails is that
the branch is in pretty good shape.
Would you please give me a summary of the
On 5/28/07, Mark Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Andrew --
Would you please give me a summary of the status? Are there regressions
on major platforms?
The summary is that powerpc-darwin, powerpc64-linux-gnu, spu-elf,
i686-linux-gnu bootstraps and tests with two regression (explained
below)
On Mon, 2007-05-28 at 15:29 -0700, Mark Mitchell wrote:
> Andrew --
>
> I'm trying to firm up GCC 4.3 planning a bit. One of the things I'm
> considering is whether or not the POINTER_PLUS branch should be merged
> as part of 4.3. My understanding from looking at your emails is that
> the branch
Andrew Pinski wrote:
I cleaned up the code today so it basically ready to be merged, some
(most?) of the target headers still need to be fixed for the change.
The list of targets which need to be changed is:
alpha ia64 mips pa
s390sparcstormy16xtensa
I don't have acc
On 5/29/07, Jeffrey Law <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I haven't followed PTR_PLUS development at all -- what specifically
spurred you to hack on this Andrew?
For spu-elf, good alignment information is needed for each load/store
as each load/store is only done on 128bit alignment. Since we lose a
On Tue, 2007-05-29 at 16:13 -0700, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> On 5/29/07, Jeffrey Law <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I haven't followed PTR_PLUS development at all -- what specifically
> > spurred you to hack on this Andrew?
>
> Since we lose a
> lot of alignment in 4.0 after
> http://gcc.gnu.org/m
On 5/30/07, Jeffrey Law <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, 2007-05-29 at 16:13 -0700, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> The next step is to see if that patch is no longer needed for hppa
> (well and fixing the hppa back-end).
I would expect you can kill that patch; I don't think you can "fix"
the PA backend
On Wed, 2007-05-30 at 17:53 -0700, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> On 5/30/07, Jeffrey Law <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Tue, 2007-05-29 at 16:13 -0700, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> > > The next step is to see if that patch is no longer needed for hppa
> > > (well and fixing the hppa back-end).
> > I would ex