Re: Porting gcj to i386-darwin

2006-03-11 Thread Mike Stump
On Mar 10, 2006, at 3:10 PM, Sandro Tolaini wrote: I have done some work on sysv.S and now libffi compiles fine on OSX/ Intel. Unfortunately, I had to put some #ifdef __APPLE__ this file because Apple ships an old cctools with as that doesn't understand some directives. My patch works on the

Re: Porting gcj to i386-darwin

2006-03-11 Thread Andrew Haley
Sandro Tolaini writes: > > On 10/mar/2006, at 20:42, Tom Tromey wrote: > > > libffi and mudflap were covered by Paolo and Andrew. > > I have done some work on sysv.S and now libffi compiles fine on OSX/ > Intel. Unfortunately, I had to put some #ifdef __APPLE__ this file > because App

Re: Porting gcj to i386-darwin

2006-03-10 Thread Sandro Tolaini
On 11/mar/2006, at 02:09, Tom Tromey wrote: Yes, one of the test cases in the libjava test suite checks this. Offhand I forget which one... but if you do a 'make check' and send the list of FAILs we can help analyze them. (This would be better done on the gcj list, [EMAIL PROTECTED]) This is

Re: Porting gcj to i386-darwin

2006-03-10 Thread Tom Tromey
> "Sandro" == Sandro Tolaini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> For best results you will want to make sure that the code to turn >> signals into exceptions works properly. This is both OS- and >> architecture dependent. I haven't looked at the x86 darwin port, >> perhaps some gcc hacking is req

Re: Porting gcj to i386-darwin

2006-03-10 Thread Sandro Tolaini
On 10/mar/2006, at 20:42, Tom Tromey wrote: libffi and mudflap were covered by Paolo and Andrew. I have done some work on sysv.S and now libffi compiles fine on OSX/ Intel. Unfortunately, I had to put some #ifdef __APPLE__ this file because Apple ships an old cctools with as that doesn't u

Re: Porting gcj to i386-darwin

2006-03-10 Thread Tom Tromey
> "Sandro" == Sandro Tolaini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Sandro> Hi everyone, I would like to port gcj/libgcj to i386-darwin. Is there Sandro> someone already working on that? Not that I know of. Sandro> target-zlib: should be sufficient to add i386-darwin to the supported Sandro> platforms

Re: Porting gcj to i386-darwin

2006-03-10 Thread Andrew Haley
Paolo Bonzini writes: > > > target-zlib: should be sufficient to add i386-darwin to the supported > > platforms > > zlib is being skipped only because libjava is. > > > target-boehm-gc: a patch exists for porting to the new platform, so it > > should be a matter of applying it > > W

Re: Porting gcj to i386-darwin

2006-03-10 Thread Paolo Bonzini
target-zlib: should be sufficient to add i386-darwin to the supported platforms zlib is being skipped only because libjava is. target-boehm-gc: a patch exists for porting to the new platform, so it should be a matter of applying it Well, good. target-libffi, target-libmudflap, target-libj

Porting gcj to i386-darwin

2006-03-10 Thread Sandro Tolaini
Hi everyone, I would like to port gcj/libgcj to i386-darwin. Is there someone already working on that? Considering that powerpc-darwin is a supported platform, it should not prove to be too hard. However, I need some hints on how to proceed. At configure phase, GCC woes for: target-libmud