Re: Probe emission in fstack-clash-protection

* Varun Kumar E. via Gcc: > Hello, > > https://godbolt.org/z/P3M8s8jqh > The above case shows that gcc first decreases the stack pointer and then > probes. > > As mentioned by Jeff Law (reference >

Re: Probe emission in fstack-clash-protection

> That may ultimately be better for -fstack-check to make it more robust, > but it still wouldn't be a viable alternative for stack clash protection > for the reasons laid out in that blog post. Well, -fstack-check does that when it's possible, e.g. on Windows, but it's not on x86[_64]/Linux

Re: Probe emission in fstack-clash-protection

On 5/2/23 22:36, Varun Kumar E via Gcc wrote: Hello, https://godbolt.org/z/P3M8s8jqh The above case shows that gcc first decreases the stack pointer and then probes. As mentioned by Jeff Law (reference

Probe emission in fstack-clash-protection

Hello, https://godbolt.org/z/P3M8s8jqh The above case shows that gcc first decreases the stack pointer and then probes. As mentioned by Jeff Law (reference ) under "More issues with