hard Earnshaw [mailto:rearn...@arm.com]
>> Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2014 11:49
>> To: Evandro Menezes; gcc@gcc.gnu.org
>> Subject: Re: [Aarch64] LRA
>>
>> On 05/11/14 17:14, Evandro Menezes wrote:
>> > It doesn't seem that the option -mno-lra does what it im
ailto:rearn...@arm.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2014 11:49
> To: Evandro Menezes; gcc@gcc.gnu.org
> Subject: Re: [Aarch64] LRA
>
> On 05/11/14 17:14, Evandro Menezes wrote:
> > It doesn't seem that the option -mno-lra does what it implies. If so,
> > what does i
On 05/11/14 17:14, Evandro Menezes wrote:
> It doesn't seem that the option -mno-lra does what it implies. If so, what
> does it do, for the it does result in differences.
It causes the compiler to use 'reload' rather than LRA for handling part
of the register allocation process.
R.
