Janis Johnson janis...@us.ibm.com writes:
My question, though, is about the case of the letters in the suffixes.
N1169 says note that the suffix is case insensitive; should I take
that literally and allow any mix of cases (as GCC currently does), or
require that the same case be used within a
Janis Johnson wrote:
I'm rewriting function interpret_float_suffix in libcpp/expr.c to fix
suffixes in decimal float literal constants for c/33466. While I'm at
it I'm fixing suffixes for fixed-point literal constants.
Currently for
fixed-point GCC accepts any ordering of the letters in
On Wed, 2009-02-11 at 10:42 -0800, Fu, Chao-Ying wrote:
Janis Johnson wrote:
I'm rewriting function interpret_float_suffix in libcpp/expr.c to fix
suffixes in decimal float literal constants for c/33466. While I'm at
it I'm fixing suffixes for fixed-point literal constants.
Janis Johnson wrote:
On Wed, 2009-02-11 at 10:42 -0800, Fu, Chao-Ying wrote:
Janis Johnson wrote:
I'm rewriting function interpret_float_suffix in libcpp/expr.c to fix
suffixes in decimal float literal constants for c/33466. While I'm at
it I'm fixing suffixes for fixed-point
On Wed, 11 Feb 2009, Janis Johnson wrote:
I'm rewriting function interpret_float_suffix in libcpp/expr.c to fix
suffixes in decimal float literal constants for c/33466. While I'm at
it I'm fixing suffixes for fixed-point literal constants. Currently for
fixed-point GCC accepts any ordering
On Wed, 2009-02-11 at 22:47 +, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
On Wed, 11 Feb 2009, Janis Johnson wrote:
I'm rewriting function interpret_float_suffix in libcpp/expr.c to fix
suffixes in decimal float literal constants for c/33466. While I'm at
it I'm fixing suffixes for fixed-point literal
