On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 06:29:20PM -0800, Mark Mitchell wrote:
I think Fortran is way down the list. That's not about how good of a
language Fortran is, or how solid the Fortran front-end is; it's just a
comment about usage of GCC.
That said, I think that the RMs do -- and should -- pay
David Daney wrote:
Joe Buck wrote:
Maybe there could be a semi-primary or experimental primary status;
a feature could be treated as primary, but with the understanding that
the requirement will be waived if it causes excessive delay. The
experimental label could be dropped after a few
On Wed, 20 Feb 2008, Weddington, Eric [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Maybe there could be a semi-primary or experimental
primary status;
a feature could be treated as primary, but with the understanding that
the requirement will be waived if it causes excessive delay. The
experimental label
Tobias Burnus wrote:
According to the GCC 4.4 Release Criteria,
http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.4/criteria.html, only C and C++ are primary
languages. And thus only C and C++ regressions can be release critical.
I propose to add Fortran to these languages.
Thank you for the suggestion.
My
According to the GCC 4.4 Release Criteria,
http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.4/criteria.html, only C and C++ are primary
languages. And thus only C and C++ regressions can be release critical.
I propose to add Fortran to these languages. Reasons:
- Fortran is relatively widely used; while C/C++ is
Tobias Burnus wrote:
According to the GCC 4.4 Release Criteria,
http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.4/criteria.html, only C and C++ are primary
languages. And thus only C and C++ regressions can be release critical.
I propose to add Fortran to these languages. Reasons:
- Fortran is relatively widely
Joel Sherrill wrote:
Tobias Burnus wrote:
According to the GCC 4.4 Release Criteria,
http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.4/criteria.html, only C and C++ are primary
languages. And thus only C and C++ regressions can be release critical.
I propose to add Fortran to these languages. Reasons:
- Fortran is
On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 02:27:27PM -0800, Tim Prince wrote:
Joel Sherrill wrote:
Tobias Burnus wrote:
According to the GCC 4.4 Release Criteria,
http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.4/criteria.html, only C and C++ are primary
languages. And thus only C and C++ regressions can be release critical.
I
Joe Buck wrote:
On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 02:27:27PM -0800, Tim Prince wrote:
Joel Sherrill wrote:
Tobias Burnus wrote:
According to the GCC 4.4 Release Criteria,
http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.4/criteria.html, only C and C++ are primary
languages. And thus only C and C++ regressions can be release
Joe Buck wrote:
On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 02:27:27PM -0800, Tim Prince wrote:
Joel Sherrill wrote:
Tobias Burnus wrote:
According to the GCC 4.4 Release Criteria,
http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.4/criteria.html, only C and C++ are primary
languages. And thus only C and C++ regressions
[adding fortran list to CC]
According to the GCC 4.4 Release Criteria,
http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.4/criteria.html, only C and C++ are primary
languages. And thus only C and C++ regressions can be release
critical.
I propose to add Fortran to these languages.
My first thought is does
-Original Message-
From: Joe Buck [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2008 3:31 PM
To: Tim Prince
Cc: Joel Sherrill; Tobias Burnus; GCC
Subject: Re: RFC: GCC 4.4 criteria - add Fortran as primary language?
Maybe there could be a semi-primary or experimental
12 matches
Mail list logo
