On Sat, Nov 08, 2014 at 09:01:14PM +0100, Tobias Grosser wrote:
> On 08.11.2014 20:49, Roman Gareev wrote:
> >>Sounds good as long as they will compile and pass tests independently.
> >>Please also remember updating the documentation.
> >
> >I’m trying to build Graphite without CLooG, but I get the
On 08.11.2014 20:49, Roman Gareev wrote:
Sounds good as long as they will compile and pass tests independently.
Please also remember updating the documentation.
I’m trying to build Graphite without CLooG, but I get the following error:
libbackend.a(graphite-optimize-isl.o): In function `getSch
> Sounds good as long as they will compile and pass tests independently.
> Please also remember updating the documentation.
I’m trying to build Graphite without CLooG, but I get the following error:
libbackend.a(graphite-optimize-isl.o): In function `getScheduleForBandList':
/home/roman/sec_trunk
Richard Biener wrote:
On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 8:02 AM, Tobias Grosser wrote:
Also, as Tobias suggested we should raise the minimal supported isl level to
0.14 to be sure PR 62289 is fixed.
As I am testing with system isl/cloog that would be unfortunate as it means
I'd either drop testing graphi
On 06.11.2014 20:08, Roman Gareev wrote:
As the ISL code generator has been default since a while and we did not get
many bug reports, the actual switch seems to have worked well. We could
probably still need some testing, but in this case it is most likely time to
drop the CLooG support entirely
> As the ISL code generator has been default since a while and we did not get
> many bug reports, the actual switch seems to have worked well. We could
> probably still need some testing, but in this case it is most likely time to
> drop the CLooG support entirely. Are you interested to provide the
On Thu, Nov 06, 2014 at 10:43:16AM +0100, Tobias Grosser wrote:
> is there any chance we can add the deprecated isl_int includes back into isl
> 0.14.1. This would unblock the testing and we could remove them as soon as
> gcc 4.8/4.9 has been phased out.
I prefer Richard's solution.
In any case, y
On 11/6/14, Tobias Grosser wrote:
> On 06.11.2014 11:15, Richard Biener wrote:
>> On 11/6/14, Tobias Grosser wrote:
>>> On 06.11.2014 10:05, Richard Biener wrote:
On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 8:02 AM, Tobias Grosser
wrote:
> On 06.11.2014 07:04, Roman Gareev wrote:
>>>
>>> CLooG
On 06.11.2014 11:15, Richard Biener wrote:
On 11/6/14, Tobias Grosser wrote:
On 06.11.2014 10:05, Richard Biener wrote:
On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 8:02 AM, Tobias Grosser wrote:
On 06.11.2014 07:04, Roman Gareev wrote:
CLooG is not necessarily needed. You can run graphite just with ISL.
The
ma
On 11/6/14, Tobias Grosser wrote:
> On 06.11.2014 10:05, Richard Biener wrote:
>> On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 8:02 AM, Tobias Grosser wrote:
>>> On 06.11.2014 07:04, Roman Gareev wrote:
>
> CLooG is not necessarily needed. You can run graphite just with ISL.
> The
> main reason that IS
On 06.11.2014 10:05, Richard Biener wrote:
On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 8:02 AM, Tobias Grosser wrote:
On 06.11.2014 07:04, Roman Gareev wrote:
CLooG is not necessarily needed. You can run graphite just with ISL. The
main reason that ISL code generation is not enabled by default is that we
did not
On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 8:02 AM, Tobias Grosser wrote:
> On 06.11.2014 07:04, Roman Gareev wrote:
>>>
>>> CLooG is not necessarily needed. You can run graphite just with ISL. The
>>> main reason that ISL code generation is not enabled by default is that we
>>> did not yet get extensive testing and
On 06.11.2014 07:04, Roman Gareev wrote:
CLooG is not necessarily needed. You can run graphite just with ISL. The
main reason that ISL code generation is not enabled by default is that we
did not yet get extensive testing and it was unclear who will have the time
to fix possible bugs.
Could you
> CLooG is not necessarily needed. You can run graphite just with ISL. The
> main reason that ISL code generation is not enabled by default is that we
> did not yet get extensive testing and it was unclear who will have the time
> to fix possible bugs.
Could you please advise me which test suites
On 04.11.2014 16:17, Tobias Burnus wrote:
Hi all,
currently, contrib/download_prerequisites downloads isl-0.12.2 from
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/infrastructure/$ISL.tar.bz2
However, that version has a bug which causes an ICE (PR 62289).
End of October, ISL 0.14 was released, which should contain
On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 4:17 PM, Tobias Burnus
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> currently, contrib/download_prerequisites downloads isl-0.12.2 from
> ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/infrastructure/$ISL.tar.bz2
>
> However, that version has a bug which causes an ICE (PR 62289).
> End of October, ISL 0.14 was released
Hi all,
currently, contrib/download_prerequisites downloads isl-0.12.2 from
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/infrastructure/$ISL.tar.bz2
However, that version has a bug which causes an ICE (PR 62289).
End of October, ISL 0.14 was released, which should contain a fix for
that issue. Hence, one should con
17 matches
Mail list logo
