This may be of interest to KDE developers. So adding them to the CC list.
Manuel.
On 5 April 2010 17:20, Benjamin Kosnik wrote:
>
> Hello all!
>
> I've put up a short diagnostics comparison between gcc, icc, and
> clang. It is my plan to update this with major revisions to individual
> compilers
On 5 April 2010 17:20, Benjamin Kosnik wrote:
>
> Included are most of the outstanding bugzilla requests with the
> "diagnostic" keyword. However, I am looking for help! Please send me
> code samples that frustrate, obfuscate, and annoy.
Some PRs missing in this list:
986
13452
13657
15766
16663
Laurent GUERBY wrote:
On Tue, 2010-04-06 at 12:02 -0700, Joe Buck wrote:
http://blog.llvm.org/2010/04/amazing-feats-of-clang-error-recovery.html
...As it happens, some C++ diagnostics are better than the
same diagnostic for C and viceversa.
On Tue, Apr 06, 2010 at 09:45:11AM -0700, Chris Lattn
On Tue, 2010-04-06 at 12:02 -0700, Joe Buck wrote:
> > >> http://blog.llvm.org/2010/04/amazing-feats-of-clang-error-recovery.html
> > >
> > > ...As it happens, some C++ diagnostics are better than the
> > > same diagnostic for C and viceversa.
>
> On Tue, Apr 06, 2010 at 09:45:11AM -0700, Chris L
> >> http://blog.llvm.org/2010/04/amazing-feats-of-clang-error-recovery.html
> >
> > ...As it happens, some C++ diagnostics are better than the
> > same diagnostic for C and viceversa.
On Tue, Apr 06, 2010 at 09:45:11AM -0700, Chris Lattner wrote:
> I think all the C examples are also valid C++
On Apr 6, 2010, at 9:29 AM, Manuel López-Ibáñez wrote:
>> Hi Benjamin,
>>
>> I wrote a little blog post that shows off some of the things that Clang can
>> do. It would be great to improve some of GCC/G++'s diagnostics in a similar
>> way:
>>
>> http://blog.llvm.org/2010/04/amazing-feats-of-cl
On 6 April 2010 18:00, Chris Lattner wrote:
>
> On Apr 5, 2010, at 8:20 AM, Benjamin Kosnik wrote:
>
>>
>> Hello all!
>>
>> I've put up a short diagnostics comparison between gcc, icc, and
>> clang. It is my plan to update this with major revisions to individual
>> compilers.
>>
>> Included are mo
On Tue, Apr 06, 2010 at 09:00:16AM -0700, Chris Lattner wrote:
> I wrote a little blog post that shows off some of the things that Clang can
> do. It would be great to improve some of GCC/G++'s diagnostics in a similar
> way:
>
> http://blog.llvm.org/2010/04/amazing-feats-of-clang-error-recover
On Apr 5, 2010, at 8:20 AM, Benjamin Kosnik wrote:
>
> Hello all!
>
> I've put up a short diagnostics comparison between gcc, icc, and
> clang. It is my plan to update this with major revisions to individual
> compilers.
>
> Included are most of the outstanding bugzilla requests with the
> "
On Apr 5, 2010, at 12:51 PM, Benjamin Kosnik wrote:
>>
>> 5) There are a couple cases of GCC rejecting valid code (e.g. 19377),
>> or which there may be some debate about (19538) it might be worth
>> pointing this out. *shrug*
>
> One of the goals was to measure the output when the input is
> t
> 2) The clang invocations don't need -fcaret-diagnostics
> -fshow-source-location -fdiagnostics-fixit-info because they are the
> default.
>
> 3) It's best to not pass -fdiagnostics-print-source-range-info unless
> you're looking for machine interpretable output. This flag adds
> things like {3
> How to contribute? patches against the html? I see there are some
> examples without output. Also, it would be nicer if the page linked to
> each PR in bugzilla.
Well, the html is auto-generated so that isn't really the way to go.
Should I just check in the tests + xml into some gcc repository?
On 5 April 2010 17:20, Benjamin Kosnik wrote:
>
> Hello all!
>
> I've put up a short diagnostics comparison between gcc, icc, and
> clang. It is my plan to update this with major revisions to individual
> compilers.
Awesome!
How to contribute? patches against the html? I see there are some
examp
On Apr 5, 2010, at 8:20 AM, Benjamin Kosnik wrote:
>
> Hello all!
>
> I've put up a short diagnostics comparison between gcc, icc, and
> clang. It is my plan to update this with major revisions to individual
> compilers.
>
> Included are most of the outstanding bugzilla requests with the
> "
Hello all!
I've put up a short diagnostics comparison between gcc, icc, and
clang. It is my plan to update this with major revisions to individual
compilers.
Included are most of the outstanding bugzilla requests with the
"diagnostic" keyword. However, I am looking for help! Please send me
cod
15 matches
Mail list logo
