On Sun, 7 Aug 2011, H.J. Lu wrote:
HOST_BITS_PER_WIDE_INT isn't defined in target library.
I need to check if HOST_BITS_PER_WIDE_INT is defined
first. Here is the updated patch.
As I said in http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2011-07/msg00488.html, you need
to check all CLVC_* uses for cases that
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 12:28 PM, Joseph S. Myers
jos...@codesourcery.com wrote:
On Sun, 7 Aug 2011, H.J. Lu wrote:
HOST_BITS_PER_WIDE_INT isn't defined in target library.
I need to check if HOST_BITS_PER_WIDE_INT is defined
first. Here is the updated patch.
As I said in
On Wed, 17 Aug 2011, H.J. Lu wrote:
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 12:28 PM, Joseph S. Myers
jos...@codesourcery.com wrote:
On Sun, 7 Aug 2011, H.J. Lu wrote:
HOST_BITS_PER_WIDE_INT isn't defined in target library.
I need to check if HOST_BITS_PER_WIDE_INT is defined
first. Here is the
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 1:35 PM, Joseph S. Myers
jos...@codesourcery.com wrote:
On Wed, 17 Aug 2011, H.J. Lu wrote:
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 12:28 PM, Joseph S. Myers
jos...@codesourcery.com wrote:
On Sun, 7 Aug 2011, H.J. Lu wrote:
HOST_BITS_PER_WIDE_INT isn't defined in target library.
On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 7:06 AM, Joseph S. Myers jos...@codesourcery.com wrote:
On Tue, 9 Aug 2011, H.J. Lu wrote:
Is this OK for trunk?
No. You don't need to ping so often; I'll look at it in due course once
sufficient time has passed since the last posted revision (if a patch
keeps
On Tue, 16 Aug 2011, H.J. Lu wrote:
On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 7:06 AM, Joseph S. Myers jos...@codesourcery.com
wrote:
On Tue, 9 Aug 2011, H.J. Lu wrote:
Is this OK for trunk?
No. You don't need to ping so often; I'll look at it in due course once
sufficient time has passed since the
Is this OK for trunk?
On Sun, Aug 7, 2011 at 7:18 PM, H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Aug 6, 2011 at 9:05 AM, H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com wrote:
Ping. AVX2 support depends on this patch.
---
2011-08-04 H.J. Lu hongjiu...@intel.com
Igor Zamyatin
On Tue, 9 Aug 2011, H.J. Lu wrote:
Is this OK for trunk?
No. You don't need to ping so often; I'll look at it in due course once
sufficient time has passed since the last posted revision (if a patch
keeps getting new versions posted, I consider that evidence that I should
wait a while
On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 7:06 AM, Joseph S. Myers jos...@codesourcery.com wrote:
On Tue, 9 Aug 2011, H.J. Lu wrote:
Is this OK for trunk?
No. You don't need to ping so often; I'll look at it in due course once
sufficient time has passed since the last posted revision (if a patch
keeps
On Sat, Aug 6, 2011 at 9:05 AM, H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com wrote:
Ping. AVX2 support depends on this patch.
Thanks.
On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 5:49 PM, H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 4:44 PM, H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 3:46 PM, Joseph
10 matches
Mail list logo
