Hello,
I apologise for this problem, but I've been recieving emails regarding the
project you are working on.
However, I'm unable to understand the context of this project.
But it looks exciting!
I would be thankful if you can help me through the project framework, and
share the exact details, so
* Arsen Arsenović via Gcc:
> Sam James via Gcc writes:
>
>> Florian Weimer via Gcc writes:
>>
>>> My understanding of the consensus goes as follows:
>>>
>>> * We want to make some changes in this area for GCC 14.
>>> * We should do the same thing that Clang does: default to the relevant
>>> -W
Sam James via Gcc writes:
> Florian Weimer via Gcc writes:
>
>> My understanding of the consensus goes as follows:
>>
>> * We want to make some changes in this area for GCC 14.
>> * We should do the same thing that Clang does: default to the relevant
>> -Werror= options.
>> * Unlike regular w
Jeff Law via Gcc writes:
> On 9/26/23 02:28, Florian Weimer via Gcc wrote:
>> My understanding of the consensus goes as follows:
>> * We want to make some changes in this area for GCC 14.
>> * We should do the same thing that Clang does: default to the relevant
>>-Werror= options.
>> * Unli
Florian Weimer via Gcc writes:
> My understanding of the consensus goes as follows:
>
> * We want to make some changes in this area for GCC 14.
> * We should do the same thing that Clang does: default to the relevant
> -Werror= options.
> * Unlike regular warnings, these warnings-as-errors sh
* Jeff Law:
>> I think the open issues are:
>> * Do we want to implement something else beside implicit-int and
>>implicit-function-declaration? (Candidates are int-conversion and
>>incompatible-pointer-types, and the void vs non-void part of
>>return-type, maybe others as previously
On 9/26/23 02:28, Florian Weimer via Gcc wrote:
My understanding of the consensus goes as follows:
* We want to make some changes in this area for GCC 14.
* We should do the same thing that Clang does: default to the relevant
-Werror= options.
* Unlike regular warnings, these warnings-as-e
* Jakub Jelinek:
> On Tue, Sep 26, 2023 at 10:28:34AM +0200, Florian Weimer via Gcc wrote:
>> My understanding of the consensus goes as follows:
>>
>> * We want to make some changes in this area for GCC 14.
>> * We should do the same thing that Clang does: default to the relevant
>> -Werror= op
On Tue, Sep 26, 2023 at 10:28:34AM +0200, Florian Weimer via Gcc wrote:
> My understanding of the consensus goes as follows:
>
> * We want to make some changes in this area for GCC 14.
> * We should do the same thing that Clang does: default to the relevant
> -Werror= options.
I think it doesn'
My understanding of the consensus goes as follows:
* We want to make some changes in this area for GCC 14.
* We should do the same thing that Clang does: default to the relevant
-Werror= options.
* Unlike regular warnings, these warnings-as-errors should also apply
to system headers.
* At leas
10 matches
Mail list logo
