Joseph Myers :
> In practice there are a lot of ways people have messed up ChangeLog
> commits or commit messages that I would expect to confuse such author
> extraction, even before you get to the parts of the history converted from
> CVS.
This is also true.
I looked seriously at what it woul
On Mon, 10 Oct 2016, Eric S. Raymond wrote:
> I strongly recomend that if you want to try this, you separate it from the
> initial repo conversion. That is, get the project to git first. Then
> see if you can data-mine author information out of the history. If,
> and only if, you get results tha
Joseph Myers :
> This is still hypothetical, since I haven't seen any scripts posted that
> would actual implement this, or any resulting mappings of commits, and one
> wouldn't normally expect a repository conversion to attempt to distinguish
> committer from author when the source version cont
On Mon, 10 Oct 2016, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> > My view is: contributors are free to specify what name and email address
> > they want used, but if they want something other than a single name and
> > email address for the whole commit history with a given username, it's the
> > contributor's resp
On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 6:38 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On 7 October 2016 at 22:26, Joseph Myers wrote:
>> On Fri, 7 Oct 2016, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote:
>>> FWIW, I thought at one point the consensus was that the mailmap would
>>> expand only to $use...@gcc.gnu.org rather than $userid@$organizatio
On 7 October 2016 at 22:26, Joseph Myers wrote:
> On Fri, 7 Oct 2016, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote:
>> FWIW, I thought at one point the consensus was that the mailmap would
>> expand only to $use...@gcc.gnu.org rather than $userid@$organization,
>> esp. considering the case where there is no single $orga
On Fri, 7 Oct 2016, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote:
> joseph wrote:
>
> > Thanks, here are further authors map additions for new committers.
> > [...]
> > avieira = Andre Vieira
> > [...]
>
> FWIW, I thought at one point the consensus was that the mailmap would
> expand only to $use...@gcc.gnu.org rath
joseph wrote:
> Thanks, here are further authors map additions for new committers.
> [...]
> avieira = Andre Vieira
> [...]
FWIW, I thought at one point the consensus was that the mailmap would
expand only to $use...@gcc.gnu.org rather than $userid@$organization,
esp. considering the case where
On Fri, 7 Oct 2016, Jason Merrill wrote:
> But if you want to do it with reposurgeon, I won't complain. I've
> pushed my WIP to https://github.com/jicama/gcc-reposurgeon
Thanks, here are further authors map additions for new committers.
avieira = Andre Vieira
foreese = Fritz Reese
jemarch = J
On Fri, 7 Oct 2016, Jason Merrill wrote:
> no additional commits, and keeps other branches that were deleted in
> SVN, though I was able to work around this with a postprocessing
> script.
I suppose there's the question of what we want cases where branches might
have been deleted to look like, b
Jason Merrill :
> > I've used both git-svn (sometimes with git filter-branch) and reposurgeon
> > for repository conversions. My experience is that if there's anything at
> > all complicated or messy about the history, using git-svn for the
> > conversion is not a good idea, so I don't think that'
On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 4:31 PM, Joseph Myers wrote:
> On Thu, 6 Oct 2016, Jason Merrill wrote:
>
>> After I ran into a couple of reposurgeon bugs and didn't hear back
>> from you, I started investigating rewriting the existing git svn
>> mirror with git filter-branch instead. That seems an attrac
Jason Merrill writes:
> [...] gcc.gnu.org already refuses git connections fairly frequently
> due to overloading [...]
With the corresponding reduction in cpu load from svn users, plus the
ready adjustability of those xinetd thresholds, please don't let that
hold you back.
- FChE
On Thu, 6 Oct 2016, Jason Merrill wrote:
> After I ran into a couple of reposurgeon bugs and didn't hear back
> from you, I started investigating rewriting the existing git svn
> mirror with git filter-branch instead. That seems an attractive
> option, but not long afterward I needed to shift foc
On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 1:19 PM, Eric S. Raymond wrote:
> Joseph Myers :
>> On Thu, 6 Oct 2016, Eric S. Raymond wrote:
>>
>> > I thought the gcc conversion was done.
>> >
>> > I can make the repository available again if it's needed.
>>
>> The conversion got stalled (I'm not sure why; maybe just Ja
Joseph Myers :
> On Thu, 6 Oct 2016, Eric S. Raymond wrote:
>
> > I thought the gcc conversion was done.
> >
> > I can make the repository available again if it's needed.
>
> The conversion got stalled (I'm not sure why; maybe just Jason being busy
> with other things) but is still intended (I'
On Thu, 6 Oct 2016, Eric S. Raymond wrote:
> I thought the gcc conversion was done.
>
> I can make the repository available again if it's needed.
The conversion got stalled (I'm not sure why; maybe just Jason being busy
with other things) but is still intended (I'm not sure for when), so yes
t
Joseph Myers :
> On Thu, 27 Aug 2015, Eric S. Raymond wrote:
>
> > I've made it available at:
> >
> > http://thyrsus.com/gitweb/?p=gcc-conversion.git
>
> What happened with this repository? Is it somewhere else now? Pulling in
> my clone of git://thyrsus.com/repositories/gcc-conversion.git ha
On Thu, 27 Aug 2015, Eric S. Raymond wrote:
> I've made it available at:
>
> http://thyrsus.com/gitweb/?p=gcc-conversion.git
What happened with this repository? Is it somewhere else now? Pulling in
my clone of git://thyrsus.com/repositories/gcc-conversion.git has produced
"thyrsus.com[0: 71.
Richard Biener writes:
>> Using d...@gcc.gnu.org would imply that is my email address, but email
>> sent there would vanish.
>
> Would it? You're supposed to have a valid forwarding address on that.
Frank tested it and it does seem to forward to me, so I guess so.
Richard Earnshaw :
> Well if that's the case then someone ought to be able to produce a meta
> file that could be supplied to Eric, that looked something like
>
> $SVN: r
> $Committer:
> $Author:...
> $Author:...
> $Author:...
> ...
>
> $SVN:...
> $Committer:
> $NoAuthors
>
>
>
>
> For t
Michael Matz :
> I don't see why the problems with some ranges of commits should prevent us
> doing better for those ranges where there are no such problems. I thought
> reposurgeon (I haven't looked at it) had the ability to postprocess
> commits and dig out additional info, and assumed it wou
On 09/17/2015 10:24 AM, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
[ snip ]
No, I'm not going to do that work; and personally, I don't think it's
worth holding up the switch to wait for that to be done.
Agreed.
Jeff
On 17/09/15 17:08, Michael Matz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, 17 Sep 2015, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
>
>> None of this has any chance of working for any commits to the pre-egcs
>> sources. In those days there was no version control on the ChangeLog
>> file.
>>
>> My feeling is we could spend months r
Hi,
On Thu, 17 Sep 2015, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
> None of this has any chance of working for any commits to the pre-egcs
> sources. In those days there was no version control on the ChangeLog
> file.
>
> My feeling is we could spend months ratholing on this particular problem
> rather than
On 17/09/15 16:15, Michael Matz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, 17 Sep 2015, Eric S. Raymond wrote:
>
>> All I can say is every time I've tried this it's been a nightmare, and
>> when you say "apart from CVS imported revisions" my hair stands on end.
>> And the GCC history is two and a half times the
Hi,
On Thu, 17 Sep 2015, Eric S. Raymond wrote:
> All I can say is every time I've tried this it's been a nightmare, and
> when you say "apart from CVS imported revisions" my hair stands on end.
> And the GCC history is two and a half times the size of the next largest
> repo I've tried this
Richard Biener :
> Maybe I'm missing sth but apart from the CVS imported revisions each
> SVN revision should contain the actual change plus the changes to the
> ChangeLog files (you can't count on the commit message itself I guess
> as not all people replicate the ChangeLog entries there).
>
> Th
On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 12:41 PM, Eric S. Raymond wrote:
> Richard Biener :
>> Not sure why we can't label the individual commits with Authors scraped
>> from the ChangeLog entries in that commit. Some commits even have
>> multiple authors after all! And if that fails I'd rather use the
>> @gcc
Richard Biener :
> Not sure why we can't label the individual commits with Authors scraped
> from the ChangeLog entries in that commit. Some commits even have
> multiple authors after all! And if that fails I'd rather use the @gcc.gnu.org
> identity.
Because associating ChangeLog entries with re
On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 4:57 AM, DJ Delorie wrote:
>
> "Frank Ch. Eigler" writes:
>> That makes sense, but how many people are in cagney's shoes
>
> I am one of those people - I have two email addresses listed in
> MAINTAINERS, with two sets of copyright papers filed with the FSF (a
> personal as
"Frank Ch. Eigler" writes:
> That makes sense, but how many people are in cagney's shoes
I am one of those people - I have two email addresses listed in
MAINTAINERS, with two sets of copyright papers filed with the FSF (a
personal assignment and a work one). I use the appropriate email
address
On 09/16/2015 11:21 AM, Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote:
On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 6:06 PM, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote:
Hi -
[...]
- rewrite history - use some totally arbitrary, and quickly outdated,
internet identity
I think this is main reason why @gnu.org or @gmail.com style addresses
are prefer
On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 6:06 PM, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote:
> Hi -
>
>> [...]
>> >- rewrite history - use some totally arbitrary, and quickly outdated,
>> >internet identity
>
>> I think this is main reason why @gnu.org or @gmail.com style addresses
>> are preferred over employer addresses when there
Hi -
> [...]
> >- rewrite history - use some totally arbitrary, and quickly outdated,
> >internet identity
> I think this is main reason why @gnu.org or @gmail.com style addresses
> are preferred over employer addresses when there's > 1 address on file.
That makes sense, but how many people are
On 09/16/2015 09:26 AM, Andrew Cagney wrote:
On 15 September 2015 at 21:36, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote:
cagney = Andrew Cagney
cag...@gnu.org?
Good point. The email identities of people change over time; forcing
a single arbitrary one to label all contributions is at best imprecise
and at wo
On 15 September 2015 at 21:36, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote:
>
>>> cagney = Andrew Cagney
>> cag...@gnu.org?
>
> Good point. The email identities of people change over time; forcing
> a single arbitrary one to label all contributions is at best imprecise
> and at worse a miscrediting. (This is one wa
>> cagney = Andrew Cagney
> cag...@gnu.org?
Good point. The email identities of people change over time; forcing
a single arbitrary one to label all contributions is at best imprecise
and at worse a miscrediting. (This is one way in which the impersonal
use...@gcc.gnu.org aliases work better.)
On 28 August 2015 at 13:24, Jeff Law wrote:
> cagney = Andrew Cagney
cag...@gnu.org?
On Fri, 28 Aug 2015 17:50:53 +
Joseph Myers wrote:
> shinwell = Mark Shinwell
> (Jane Street)
Mark's current address is mshinw...@janestreet.com.
Julian
Rainer Orth :
> The current entry
>
> ro = Rainer Orth
>
> lists my old email address. Please use r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de
> instead.
Done.
--
http://www.catb.org/~esr/";>Eric S. Raymond
"Eric S. Raymond" writes:
> I've made it available at:
>
> http://thyrsus.com/gitweb/?p=gcc-conversion.git
>
> The interesting content is gcc.map (the contributor map) and gcc.lift.
The current entry
ro = Rainer Orth
lists my old email address. Please use r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de
instea
ubject: Repository for the conversion machinery
>
> I've made it available at:
>
> http://thyrsus.com/gitweb/?p=gcc-conversion.git
>
> The interesting content is gcc.map (the contributor map) and gcc.lift.
>
> Presently the only command in gcc.lift expunges
On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 1:24 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
> trix = Tom Rix
> Not with Red Hat anymore. No idea where he is now.
Tom now works for Juniper Networks. A recent email address is:
trix = Tom Rix
- David
On 08/28/2015 12:29 PM, Eric S. Raymond wrote:
Jeff Law :
Here's my stab at all the @cygnus.com and @redhat.com addresses. There's
several I lost track of through the years.
Would you please resend this as a contrib map with the updated
addresses in it? I find that when I hand-edit these in I
Joseph Myers :
> FWIW, updates for some out-of-date codesourcery.com addresses:
>
> dgutson = Daniel Gutson
> mmitchel = Mark Mitchell
> mmitchell = Mark Mitchell
> pbrook = Paul Brook
> (don't know if it's his preferred address, but it's his domain so
>is likely be valid)
> qiyao = Yao
On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 11:24:30AM -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
> abalkiss = Anthony Balkissoon
> No clue on this one, not with Red Hat anymore.
>
> aluchko = Aaron Luchko
> Grad Student at University of Alberta.
>
> djee = David Jee
> No clue. Not with Red Hat anymore
>
> kgallowa = Kyle Galloway
>
Jeff Law :
> Here's my stab at all the @cygnus.com and @redhat.com addresses. There's
> several I lost track of through the years.
Would you please resend this as a contrib map with the updated
addresses in it? I find that when I hand-edit these in I make too
many cut'n'paste errors. Given a cont
Peter Bergner :
> On Fri, 2015-08-28 at 11:00 -0400, Eric S. Raymond wrote:
> > Peter Bergner :
> > > On Thu, 2015-08-27 at 10:38 -0400, Eric S. Raymond wrote:
> > > > I've made it available at:
> > > >
> > > > http://thyrsus.com/gitweb/?p=gcc-conversion.git
> > > >
> > > > The interesting conten
FWIW, updates for some out-of-date codesourcery.com addresses:
dgutson = Daniel Gutson
mmitchel = Mark Mitchell
mmitchell = Mark Mitchell
pbrook = Paul Brook
(don't know if it's his preferred address, but it's his domain so
is likely be valid)
qiyao = Yao Qi
I don't have other addresses
On 08/28/2015 09:57 AM, Eric S. Raymond wrote:
Jeff Law :
Given that I worked for Cygnus and still work with Red Hat, I can make a
pass over all the @cygnus.com addresses and probably give something more
up-to-date for most of them if that's useful.
That would be *very* useful.
Here's my stab
On Fri, 2015-08-28 at 11:00 -0400, Eric S. Raymond wrote:
> Peter Bergner :
> > On Thu, 2015-08-27 at 10:38 -0400, Eric S. Raymond wrote:
> > > I've made it available at:
> > >
> > > http://thyrsus.com/gitweb/?p=gcc-conversion.git
> > >
> > > The interesting content is gcc.map (the contributor ma
On August 28, 2015 5:02:39 PM GMT+02:00, "Eric S. Raymond"
wrote:
>Joseph Myers :
>> There's at least one case of a contributor who changed their name
>where
>> you have the old name instead of the new one: Richard Guenther ->
>Richard
>> Biener.
>
>Is
>
>rguenth = Richard Biener
>
>correct?
Jeff Law :
> Given that I worked for Cygnus and still work with Red Hat, I can make a
> pass over all the @cygnus.com addresses and probably give something more
> up-to-date for most of them if that's useful.
That would be *very* useful.
--
http://www.catb.org/~esr/";>Eric S. Raym
Joseph Myers :
> (if someone appears with multiple usernames, probably make their address
>consistent for all of them unless specifically requested otherwise)
I am attemoting to do that.
--
http://www.catb.org/~esr/";>Eric S. Raymond
On 08/28/2015 09:26 AM, Joseph Myers wrote:
All the cygnus.com addresses are out of date. More current replacements
for a few:
echristo = Eric Christopher
merrill = Jason Merrill
(if someone appears with multiple usernames, probably make their address
consistent for all of them unless
All the cygnus.com addresses are out of date. More current replacements
for a few:
echristo = Eric Christopher
merrill = Jason Merrill
(if someone appears with multiple usernames, probably make their address
consistent for all of them unless specifically requested otherwise)
rsavoye = Ro
On Fri, 28 Aug 2015, Eric S. Raymond wrote:
> Joseph Myers :
> > There's at least one case of a contributor who changed their name where
> > you have the old name instead of the new one: Richard Guenther -> Richard
> > Biener.
>
> Is
>
> rguenth = Richard Biener
>
> correct?
Yes, that's rig
Peter Bergner :
> > jgrimm = Jon Grimm
>
> Jon is now at Canonical. I'm not sure which of the two email addresses
> that seem to be active for him he prefers:
>
> jon.gr...@canonical.com
> jon.gr...@gmail.com
I'll go wit the gmail one unless he tells mme differently; odds are it w
Joseph Myers :
> There's at least one case of a contributor who changed their name where
> you have the old name instead of the new one: Richard Guenther -> Richard
> Biener.
Is
rguenth = Richard Biener
correct?
--
http://www.catb.org/~esr/";>Eric S. Raymond
Peter Bergner :
> On Thu, 2015-08-27 at 10:38 -0400, Eric S. Raymond wrote:
> > I've made it available at:
> >
> > http://thyrsus.com/gitweb/?p=gcc-conversion.git
> >
> > The interesting content is gcc.map (the contributor map) and gcc.lift.
> >
> > Presently the only command in gcc.lift expunge
> azanella = Adhemerval Zanella
Adhemerval now works for Linaro, so his email address should be:
adhemerval.zane...@linaro.org
> bje = Ben Elliston
Ben is no longer at Red Hat...or IBM. He went back to school and his
new email address seems to be:
b.ellis...@unsw.edu.au
>
There's at least one case of a contributor who changed their name where
you have the old name instead of the new one: Richard Guenther -> Richard
Biener.
--
Joseph S. Myers
jos...@codesourcery.com
On Thu, 2015-08-27 at 10:38 -0400, Eric S. Raymond wrote:
> I've made it available at:
>
> http://thyrsus.com/gitweb/?p=gcc-conversion.git
>
> The interesting content is gcc.map (the contributor map) and gcc.lift.
>
> Presently the only command in gcc.lift expunges the hooks directory.
>From yo
On Thu, 2015-08-27 at 16:13 +, Joseph Myers wrote:
> 273 missing usernames (this is based on grepping the output of svn log on
> an rsync mirror of the repository, so it's possible one or two could be
> spurious, but should be pretty accurate). I've made no attempt to map
> these to emails
DJ Delorie :
>
> > If you want your commits to be attributed to two different addresses
> > in the git conversion, you need to tell me how to specify two
> > different selection sets so I can write assign statements and two
> > trivial "authors read" commands affecting them only.
> >
> > assuming
> If you want your commits to be attributed to two different addresses
> in the git conversion, you need to tell me how to specify two
> different selection sets so I can write assign statements and two
> trivial "authors read" commands affecting them only.
>
> assuming that the names m32c and djg
DJ Delorie :
>
> Hmmm... I use two email addresses for commits, depending on which target
> they're for, i.e.:
>
> $ grep DJ MAINTAINERS
> m32c port DJ Delorie
> DJGPP DJ Delorie
>
> Most of the DJGPP stuff was long ago but I wonder ho
Hmmm... I use two email addresses for commits, depending on which target
they're for, i.e.:
$ grep DJ MAINTAINERS
m32c port DJ Delorie
DJGPP DJ Delorie
Most of the DJGPP stuff was long ago but I wonder how the conversion
would handle t
On 27/08/15 17:42, Eric S. Raymond wrote:
> Richard Earnshaw :
>> On 27/08/15 17:03, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
>>> On 27/08/15 16:48, Eric S. Raymond wrote:
>>>
If the former, then I don't know why they're not in the map. It contains
an entry for every distinct Unix username it could extra
Richard Earnshaw :
> On 27/08/15 17:03, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
> > On 27/08/15 16:48, Eric S. Raymond wrote:
> >
> >> If the former, then I don't know why they're not in the map. It contains
> >> an entry for every distinct Unix username it could extract. What usernames
> >> should I expect the
Joseph Myers :
> 273 missing usernames (this is based on grepping the output of svn log on
> an rsync mirror of the repository, so it's possible one or two could be
> spurious, but should be pretty accurate). I've made no attempt to map
> these to emails yet.
Jason Merrill's list later in the
On 27/08/15 16:56, James Greenhalgh wrote:
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 03:38:10PM +0100, Eric S. Raymond wrote:
I've made it available at:
http://thyrsus.com/gitweb/?p=gcc-conversion.git
The interesting content is gcc.map (the contributor map) and gcc.lift.
Presently the only command in gcc.lift
On 08/27/2015 10:04 AM, FX wrote:
If the former, then I don't know why they're not in the map.
In fact, I can look at the output of “svn log” for the MAINTAINERS file, which
probably almost everyone with commit rights has modified.
This contains 442 usernames, compared to the map’s 290. And th
On 27/08/15 17:03, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
> On 27/08/15 16:48, Eric S. Raymond wrote:
>
>> If the former, then I don't know why they're not in the map. It contains
>> an entry for every distinct Unix username it could extract. What usernames
>> should I expect these people to have?
>>
>
> Thos
David Edelsohn :
> On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 11:52 AM, Eric S. Raymond wrote:
> > Joseph Myers :
> >> Where someone is listed in MAINTAINERS, I suggest preferring that email
> >> address over any older address you may have got from ChangeLogs etc.
> >> (unless they're requested otherwise or it seems
273 missing usernames (this is based on grepping the output of svn log on
an rsync mirror of the repository, so it's possible one or two could be
spurious, but should be pretty accurate). I've made no attempt to map
these to emails yet.
aaw
abalkiss
abel
abennett
abutcher
acsawdey
aesok
ahyang
On 27/08/15 17:20, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
> On 27/08/15 17:16, Eric S. Raymond wrote:
>> Paulo Matos :
>>>
>>>
>>> On 27/08/15 16:56, Paulo Matos wrote:
I noticed I am not on the list (check commit r225509, user pmatos) either.
And thanks for your help on this transition.
On 08/27/2015 10:16 AM, Eric S. Raymond wrote:
Paulo Matos :
On 27/08/15 16:56, Paulo Matos wrote:
I noticed I am not on the list (check commit r225509, user pmatos) either.
And thanks for your help on this transition.
r188804 | mkuvyrkov
Maxim Kuvyrkov
jeff
Joel Sherrill :
>
>
> On 8/27/2015 11:03 AM, Eric S. Raymond wrote:
> >Paulo Matos :
> >>I noticed I am not on the list (check commit r225509, user pmatos) either.
> >>
> >>And thanks for your help on this transition.
> >
> >I've added you to the map.
> >
>
> I will pile on. I may be in the hist
On 27/08/15 17:16, Eric S. Raymond wrote:
> Paulo Matos :
>>
>>
>> On 27/08/15 16:56, Paulo Matos wrote:
>>>
>>> I noticed I am not on the list (check commit r225509, user pmatos) either.
>>>
>>> And thanks for your help on this transition.
>>>
>>
>> r188804 | mkuvyrkov
>>
>> for example.
>
> Do
James Greenhalgh :
> On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 03:38:10PM +0100, Eric S. Raymond wrote:
> > I've made it available at:
> >
> > http://thyrsus.com/gitweb/?p=gcc-conversion.git
> >
> > The interesting content is gcc.map (the contributor map) and gcc.lift.
> >
> > Presently the only command in gcc.li
Paulo Matos :
>
>
> On 27/08/15 16:56, Paulo Matos wrote:
> >
> >I noticed I am not on the list (check commit r225509, user pmatos) either.
> >
> >And thanks for your help on this transition.
> >
>
> r188804 | mkuvyrkov
>
> for example.
Do you know a full name for this person?
--
FX :
> PS: I found one username that first escaped my scripts because it contained a
> period, so I am raising a flag here, so the same doesn’t happen to you:
> m.hayes (commit 34779).
I have that one, thanks.
--
http://www.catb.org/~esr/";>Eric S. Raymond
FX :
> >> FortranJanne Blomqvist
> >> FortranTobias Burnus
> >> FortranDaniel Franke
> >>
> >> FortranDaniel Kraft
> >> FortranMikael Morin
> >
On 27/08/15 16:56, Paulo Matos wrote:
I noticed I am not on the list (check commit r225509, user pmatos) either.
And thanks for your help on this transition.
r188804 | mkuvyrkov
for example.
--
Paulo Matos
On 8/27/2015 11:03 AM, Eric S. Raymond wrote:
Paulo Matos :
I noticed I am not on the list (check commit r225509, user pmatos) either.
And thanks for your help on this transition.
I've added you to the map.
I will pile on. I may be in the history under at least three email addresses.
j.
> If the former, then I don't know why they're not in the map.
In fact, I can look at the output of “svn log” for the MAINTAINERS file, which
probably almost everyone with commit rights has modified.
This contains 442 usernames, compared to the map’s 290. And there are probably
more, which we’ll
Paulo Matos :
> I noticed I am not on the list (check commit r225509, user pmatos) either.
>
> And thanks for your help on this transition.
I've added you to the map.
--
http://www.catb.org/~esr/";>Eric S. Raymond
On 27/08/15 16:48, Eric S. Raymond wrote:
> If the former, then I don't know why they're not in the map. It contains
> an entry for every distinct Unix username it could extract. What usernames
> should I expect these people to have?
>
Those aren't the only ones. Just looking at the SVN log f
Joseph Myers :
> For example:
>
> r225805 | jb | 2015-07-15 00:00:23 -0700 (Wed, 15 Jul 2015) | 9 lines
OK. This means the map is not yet complete.
It will be very helpful if you can send me as many missing entries as
you notice - that is, pairs of Subversion IDs and human-mame/email IDs.
When
>> Fortran Janne Blomqvist
>> Fortran Tobias Burnus
>> Fortran Daniel Franke
>>
>> Fortran Daniel Kraft
>> Fortran Mikael Morin
>> Fortran
Joseph Myers :
> On Thu, 27 Aug 2015, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
>
> > In gcc.map I see
> > anoncvs = Anonymous CVS User
> > Are there any actual commits by this user?
>
> r17330, a test commit on 1998-01-13. Presumably the test was followed by
> fixing whatever bug allowed it.
This seems ve
Ian Lance Taylor :
> A lot of the e-mail addresses are out of date, as you know. Would it
> be helpful to get updated e-mail addresses, or does it not really
> matter?
Updated addresses are better.
> In gcc.map I see
> anoncvs = Anonymous CVS User
> Are there any actual commits by this us
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 11:52 AM, Eric S. Raymond wrote:
> Joseph Myers :
>> Where someone is listed in MAINTAINERS, I suggest preferring that email
>> address over any older address you may have got from ChangeLogs etc.
>> (unless they're requested otherwise or it seems the MAINTAINERS address is
On 27/08/15 16:48, Eric S. Raymond wrote:
FX :
[context for the Fortran list: the svn repo is about to be converted into a git
repo, which will be the official gcc repo onwards]
Hi Eric,
I realize that some of our Fortran maintainers (and committers) are not listed
in the map file:
Fortra
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 03:38:10PM +0100, Eric S. Raymond wrote:
> I've made it available at:
>
> http://thyrsus.com/gitweb/?p=gcc-conversion.git
>
> The interesting content is gcc.map (the contributor map) and gcc.lift.
>
> Presently the only command in gcc.lift expunges the hooks directory.
T
Joseph Myers :
> Where someone is listed in MAINTAINERS, I suggest preferring that email
> address over any older address you may have got from ChangeLogs etc.
> (unless they're requested otherwise or it seems the MAINTAINERS address is
> the one that hasn't been kept up to date).
Hm. I tried
On Thu, 27 Aug 2015, Eric S. Raymond wrote:
> FX :
> > [context for the Fortran list: the svn repo is about to be converted into a
> > git repo, which will be the official gcc repo onwards]
> >
> > Hi Eric,
> >
> > I realize that some of our Fortran maintainers (and committers) are not
> > lis
On Thu, 27 Aug 2015, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> In gcc.map I see
> anoncvs = Anonymous CVS User
> Are there any actual commits by this user?
r17330, a test commit on 1998-01-13. Presumably the test was followed by
fixing whatever bug allowed it.
--
Joseph S. Myers
jos...@codesourcery.com
1 - 100 of 105 matches
Mail list logo
