Re: SPEC CPU 2006 and gcc

2006-09-03 Thread Toon Moene
Florian Weimer wrote: * Toon Moene: Well, I'd like to order, but it is unclear from the online documentation whether I'm eligible for the educational / non-profit price. $ 800 is a bit too much - even for my most prominent hobby. I know someone who has received (or is about to receive) a li

Re: SPEC CPU 2006 and gcc

2006-09-03 Thread Jeffrey Law
On Sun, 2006-09-03 at 19:26 +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: > * Toon Moene: > > > Well, I'd like to order, but it is unclear from the online > > documentation whether I'm eligible for the educational / non-profit > > price. > > > > $ 800 is a bit too much - even for my most prominent hobby. > > I kn

Re: SPEC CPU 2006 and gcc

2006-09-03 Thread Florian Weimer
* Toon Moene: > Well, I'd like to order, but it is unclear from the online > documentation whether I'm eligible for the educational / non-profit > price. > > $ 800 is a bit too much - even for my most prominent hobby. I know someone who has received (or is about to receive) a license he probably

Re: SPEC CPU 2006 and gcc

2006-09-03 Thread Toon Moene
H. J. Lu wrote: Has anyone tried SPEC CPU 2006 with gcc mainline and 4.1 branch? Well, I'd like to order, but it is unclear from the online documentation whether I'm eligible for the educational / non-profit price. $ 800 is a bit too much - even for my most prominent hobby. Cheers, -- Too

SPEC CPU 2006 and gcc

2006-08-31 Thread H. J. Lu
Has anyone tried SPEC CPU 2006 with gcc mainline and 4.1 branch? Currently, there is at least one regression affecting SPEC CPU 2006: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28908 I was wondering if anyone had run into problems with gcc. I need 3 patches for SPEC CPU 2006 to support gcc on Li