Florian Weimer wrote:
* Toon Moene:
Well, I'd like to order, but it is unclear from the online
documentation whether I'm eligible for the educational / non-profit
price.
$ 800 is a bit too much - even for my most prominent hobby.
I know someone who has received (or is about to receive) a li
On Sun, 2006-09-03 at 19:26 +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Toon Moene:
>
> > Well, I'd like to order, but it is unclear from the online
> > documentation whether I'm eligible for the educational / non-profit
> > price.
> >
> > $ 800 is a bit too much - even for my most prominent hobby.
>
> I kn
* Toon Moene:
> Well, I'd like to order, but it is unclear from the online
> documentation whether I'm eligible for the educational / non-profit
> price.
>
> $ 800 is a bit too much - even for my most prominent hobby.
I know someone who has received (or is about to receive) a license he
probably
H. J. Lu wrote:
Has anyone tried SPEC CPU 2006 with gcc mainline and 4.1 branch?
Well, I'd like to order, but it is unclear from the online documentation
whether I'm eligible for the educational / non-profit price.
$ 800 is a bit too much - even for my most prominent hobby.
Cheers,
--
Too
Has anyone tried SPEC CPU 2006 with gcc mainline and 4.1 branch?
Currently, there is at least one regression affecting SPEC CPU 2006:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28908
I was wondering if anyone had run into problems with gcc. I need 3
patches for SPEC CPU 2006 to support gcc on Li