Re: Since r110852: Mainline broken for VAX (cc0 target)

2006-02-14 Thread Jim Wilson
Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote: PS. No, I don't know why the simple "some search terms" doesn't work. Probably because simple search only looks at the summary field (and a few other usually useless fields), and the summary field often doesn't have the info you are searching for. If you click on th

Re: Since r110852: Mainline broken for VAX (cc0 target)

2006-02-12 Thread David Daney
Andrew Pinski wrote: On Feb 12, 2006, at 3:33 PM, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote: First of all: thanks. You're ultimatively fast. And now: How do you actually find the PRs? I seem to wrongly use Bugzilla's search engine. I submitted "int_mode_for_mode" into the "Enter a bug # or some search terms"

Re: Since r110852: Mainline broken for VAX (cc0 target)

2006-02-12 Thread Hans-Peter Nilsson
On Sun, 12 Feb 2006, David Fang wrote: > > > And now: How do you actually find the PRs? I seem to wrongly use > > > Bugzilla's search engine. I submitted "int_mode_for_mode" into the > > > "Enter a bug # or some search terms" box of > > > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ , which didn't find anything.

Re: Since r110852: Mainline broken for VAX (cc0 target)

2006-02-12 Thread David Fang
> > And now: How do you actually find the PRs? I seem to wrongly use > > Bugzilla's search engine. I submitted "int_mode_for_mode" into the > > "Enter a bug # or some search terms" box of > > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ , which didn't find anything. I don't > > really feel like wasting your time

Re: Since r110852: Mainline broken for VAX (cc0 target)

2006-02-12 Thread Andrew Pinski
On Feb 12, 2006, at 3:33 PM, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote: First of all: thanks. You're ultimatively fast. And now: How do you actually find the PRs? I seem to wrongly use Bugzilla's search engine. I submitted "int_mode_for_mode" into the "Enter a bug # or some search terms" box of http://gcc.gnu.

Re: Since r110852: Mainline broken for VAX (cc0 target)

2006-02-12 Thread Jan-Benedict Glaw
On Sun, 2006-02-12 15:26:40 -0500, Andrew Pinski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Feb 12, 2006, at 3:21 PM, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote: > >Since r110852, GCC (used as cross-compiler) can no longer build uClibc > >or (parts of) GNU libc: > > > >+2006-02-10 Zdenek Dvorak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >+ > >+

Re: Since r110852: Mainline broken for VAX (cc0 target)

2006-02-12 Thread Zdenek Dvorak
Hello, > Since r110852, GCC (used as cross-compiler) can no longer build uClibc > or (parts of) GNU libc: > > +2006-02-10 Zdenek Dvorak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > + > + * doc/invoke.texi (-floop-optimize2): Removed. > + * toplev.c (process_options): Remove handling of flag_loop_optimize2.

Re: Since r110852: Mainline broken for VAX (cc0 target)

2006-02-12 Thread Andrew Pinski
On Feb 12, 2006, at 3:21 PM, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote: Hi! Since r110852, GCC (used as cross-compiler) can no longer build uClibc or (parts of) GNU libc: +2006-02-10 Zdenek Dvorak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> + + * doc/invoke.texi (-floop-optimize2): Removed. + * toplev.c (process_options)

Since r110852: Mainline broken for VAX (cc0 target)

2006-02-12 Thread Jan-Benedict Glaw
Hi! Since r110852, GCC (used as cross-compiler) can no longer build uClibc or (parts of) GNU libc: +2006-02-10 Zdenek Dvorak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> + + * doc/invoke.texi (-floop-optimize2): Removed. + * toplev.c (process_options): Remove handling of flag_loop_optimize2. + * loop-i