icrashedtheinternet wrote:
I guess I could have worded my email a bit better. Of course I don't
assume that the GCC developers are ignoring standards. Nor do I think
any of us are unaware of GCC's ability to support a standard and have
extensions to it that go beyond the standard. So I simply
I guess I could have worded my email a bit better. Of course I don't
assume that the GCC developers are ignoring standards. Nor do I think
any of us are unaware of GCC's ability to support a standard and have
extensions to it that go beyond the standard. So I simply want to
suggest to the prope
Joe Buck wrote:
The result is that GCC explicitly rejects something that you might have
been taught in compiler class, that the standard is a contract between
the compiler developer and the users and that the compiler can do anything
it wants with any code that does not rigorously meet what is d
On Sat, Feb 03, 2007 at 01:42:06AM -0700, icrashedtheinternet wrote:
> I just read the GCC Mission Statement and I see nothing there about
> conforming to international standards for programming languages. Why
> does the GCC Mission Statement not include conforming to
> internationally accepted st
icrashedtheinternet wrote:
I just read the GCC Mission Statement and I see nothing there about
conforming to international standards for programming languages. Why
does the GCC Mission Statement not include conforming to
internationally accepted standards? Its very counterproductive not to
use
I just read the GCC Mission Statement and I see nothing there about
conforming to international standards for programming languages. Why
does the GCC Mission Statement not include conforming to
internationally accepted standards? Its very counterproductive not to
use standards.
-John Burak
