> On Thu, 9 Jul 2020, Richard Sandiford wrote:
> >> I'm trying Tree Browser during debugging, but failed.
> >> I found that tree-browser.c and tree-browser.def have been removed at
> >> 2015-07-25. So, to avoid misunderstanding, can we remove this
> >
On Thu, 9 Jul 2020, Richard Sandiford wrote:
>> I'm trying Tree Browser during debugging, but failed.
>> I found that tree-browser.c and tree-browser.def have been
>> removed at 2015-07-25. So, to avoid misunderstanding,
>> can we remove this tree-browser page too?
> T
Hu Jiangping writes:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying Tree Browser during debugging, but failed.
> I found that tree-browser.c and tree-browser.def have been
> removed at 2015-07-25. So, to avoid misunderstanding,
> can we remove this tree-browser page too?
Thanks for the patch. Seem
Hi,
I'm trying Tree Browser during debugging, but failed.
I found that tree-browser.c and tree-browser.def have been
removed at 2015-07-25. So, to avoid misunderstanding,
can we remove this tree-browser page too?
Regards.
hujp
---
htdocs/projects/tree-ssa/index.html| 6 -
htdocs
On 07/20/2015 02:33 PM, Sebastian Pop wrote:
Regstrapped on amd64-linux. Ok for trunk?
Thanks,
Sebastian
2015-07-20 Sebastian Pop s@samsung.com
* Makefile.in: Remove use of TREEBROWSER.
* config.in: Regenerated.
* configure: Regenerated.
for dynamic type safety at runtime. This is
- moderately expensive. The tree browser debugging routines will also be
- enabled by this option. */
+ moderately expensive. */
#ifndef USED_FOR_TARGET
#undef ENABLE_TREE_CHECKING
#endif
diff --git a/gcc/configure b/gcc/configure
index 9fb885d..0ba4ca5
Hi,
Try using gcc-vcg-plugin to browse tree and cfg during debug gcc. It's
just an initial version for now. Any suggestions will be appreciated.
:-)
http://code.google.com/p/gcc-vcg-plugin/
Thanks,
Eric Fisher
On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 11:45 PM, Diego Novillo dnovi...@google.com wrote:
On 5/4/10 15:11 , Wolfgang kaifler wrote:
(gdb) p browse_tree (current_function_decl)
No symbol browse_tree in current context.
(gdb)
What i'm doing wrong? Any ideas?
The tree browser code has bitrotted
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 07:18, Richard Guenther
richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
It probably also can be re-implemented as gdb python script?
Really? Wicked. I like that.
Diego.
On 5/4/10 15:11 , Wolfgang kaifler wrote:
(gdb) p browse_tree (current_function_decl)
No symbol browse_tree in current context.
(gdb)
What i'm doing wrong? Any ideas?
The tree browser code has bitrotted to the point that I think it should
be removed, unfortunately. It's a great candidate
Hi,
I've tried to use the treebrowser described at
http://gcc.gnu.org/projects/tree-ssa/tree-browser.html
I configuired gcc-4.5.0 with ... --enable-checking --enable-tree-browse
--enable-tree-checking ...
Compilation was OK, a gcc/tree-browser.o exists.
Now i'm able to launch gdb and step
11 matches
Mail list logo