RE: [wwwdocs PATCH] remove tree-browser page and links

2020-07-12 Thread Hu, Jiangping
> On Thu, 9 Jul 2020, Richard Sandiford wrote: > >> I'm trying Tree Browser during debugging, but failed. > >> I found that tree-browser.c and tree-browser.def have been removed at > >> 2015-07-25. So, to avoid misunderstanding, can we remove this > >

Re: [wwwdocs PATCH] remove tree-browser page and links

2020-07-09 Thread Gerald Pfeifer
On Thu, 9 Jul 2020, Richard Sandiford wrote: >> I'm trying Tree Browser during debugging, but failed. >> I found that tree-browser.c and tree-browser.def have been >> removed at 2015-07-25. So, to avoid misunderstanding, >> can we remove this tree-browser page too? > T

Re: [wwwdocs PATCH] remove tree-browser page and links

2020-07-09 Thread Richard Sandiford
Hu Jiangping writes: > Hi, > > I'm trying Tree Browser during debugging, but failed. > I found that tree-browser.c and tree-browser.def have been > removed at 2015-07-25. So, to avoid misunderstanding, > can we remove this tree-browser page too? Thanks for the patch. Seem

[wwwdocs PATCH] remove tree-browser page and links

2020-07-07 Thread Hu Jiangping
Hi, I'm trying Tree Browser during debugging, but failed. I found that tree-browser.c and tree-browser.def have been removed at 2015-07-25. So, to avoid misunderstanding, can we remove this tree-browser page too? Regards. hujp --- htdocs/projects/tree-ssa/index.html| 6 - htdocs

Re: [PATCH] remove tree-browser

2015-07-21 Thread Jeff Law
On 07/20/2015 02:33 PM, Sebastian Pop wrote: Regstrapped on amd64-linux. Ok for trunk? Thanks, Sebastian 2015-07-20 Sebastian Pop s@samsung.com * Makefile.in: Remove use of TREEBROWSER. * config.in: Regenerated. * configure: Regenerated.

[PATCH] remove tree-browser

2015-07-20 Thread Sebastian Pop
for dynamic type safety at runtime. This is - moderately expensive. The tree browser debugging routines will also be - enabled by this option. */ + moderately expensive. */ #ifndef USED_FOR_TARGET #undef ENABLE_TREE_CHECKING #endif diff --git a/gcc/configure b/gcc/configure index 9fb885d..0ba4ca5

Re: Tree Browser

2010-06-01 Thread Eric Fisher
Hi, Try using gcc-vcg-plugin to browse tree and cfg during debug gcc. It's just an initial version for now. Any suggestions will be appreciated. :-) http://code.google.com/p/gcc-vcg-plugin/ Thanks, Eric Fisher

Re: Tree Browser

2010-05-14 Thread Richard Guenther
On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 11:45 PM, Diego Novillo dnovi...@google.com wrote: On 5/4/10 15:11 , Wolfgang kaifler wrote: (gdb) p browse_tree (current_function_decl) No symbol browse_tree in current context. (gdb) What i'm doing wrong? Any ideas? The tree browser code has bitrotted

Re: Tree Browser

2010-05-14 Thread Diego Novillo
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 07:18, Richard Guenther richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote: It probably also can be re-implemented as gdb python script? Really? Wicked. I like that. Diego.

Re: Tree Browser

2010-05-13 Thread Diego Novillo
On 5/4/10 15:11 , Wolfgang kaifler wrote: (gdb) p browse_tree (current_function_decl) No symbol browse_tree in current context. (gdb) What i'm doing wrong? Any ideas? The tree browser code has bitrotted to the point that I think it should be removed, unfortunately. It's a great candidate

Tree Browser

2010-05-04 Thread Wolfgang kaifler
Hi, I've tried to use the treebrowser described at http://gcc.gnu.org/projects/tree-ssa/tree-browser.html I configuired gcc-4.5.0 with ... --enable-checking --enable-tree-browse --enable-tree-checking ... Compilation was OK, a gcc/tree-browser.o exists. Now i'm able to launch gdb and step