Re: Upated memory hog patch for make

2006-02-22 Thread Gerald Pfeifer
On Mon, 20 Feb 2006, H. J. Lu wrote: > 3.81rc1 works much better than 3.80. But my patch for 3.80 no longer > applies cleanly. Paul is aware of the libjava build problem and is > working on it. That's good news, thanks! I'll give 3.81 RC1 a try, and hope we'll have a release soon... Gerald

Re: Upated memory hog patch for make

2006-02-20 Thread H. J. Lu
On Mon, Feb 20, 2006 at 10:51:13AM -0800, Dan Kegel wrote: > Gerald wrote: > >On Wed, 1 Feb 2006, H. J. Lu wrote: > >> My memory hog patch for make has 2 typos. This patch fixes them. > >Thanks, H. J. What's the upstream status of your patches? > > I think they're in upstream (hopefully H.J. will

Re: Upated memory hog patch for make

2006-02-20 Thread Dan Kegel
Gerald wrote: >On Wed, 1 Feb 2006, H. J. Lu wrote: >> My memory hog patch for make has 2 typos. This patch fixes them. >Thanks, H. J. What's the upstream status of your patches? I think they're in upstream (hopefully H.J. will confirm that). I know that the O(N^2) bug that Jeff Evarts found and f

Re: Upated memory hog patch for make

2006-02-20 Thread Gerald Pfeifer
On Wed, 1 Feb 2006, H. J. Lu wrote: > My memory hog patch for make has 2 typos. This patch fixes them. Thanks, H. J. What's the upstream status of your patches? Did you submit your updated patch there as well? (As long as this patch, or a similar change, has not become part of a released versi

Upated memory hog patch for make

2006-02-01 Thread H. J. Lu
On Wed, Feb 01, 2006 at 06:33:40PM +0100, Klaus Singvogel wrote: > > Hello Mr. H. J. Lu, > I just want to inform you, that we got a problem report regarding your > "memory hog" patch from 2005-Dec-08 for gmake-3.80. If compilation of > "binutils" is started with "MALLOC_CHECK_=2", a crash in gmake