could make the code that uses Storeinc / Pack_32
(dtoa.c and mprec.c in libc/stdlib) a lot more efficient if we used the
operations defined in longlong.h .
Would it be OK to use longlong.h in newlib?
If you are referring to the longlong.h found in gcc's source tree, no,
it is GPL.
Yes, t
On Wed, 7 Jan 2009, Joern Rennecke wrote:
> Yes, that is the longlong.h I was referring to. I thought that it had the
> gcc library exception, so that we could simply autoconf its use in newlib.
> However, looking at the file, I see that you are correct, it is GPL without
> a library exception.
>
Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> As code shared by GCC and glibc I would suggest the same license notice as
> soft-fp (LGPL >= 2.1 + exception) to allow an identical file to be shared.
> (Indeed, soft-fp uses this header.) The version in GMP diverged long ago
> so sharing the file with that may not b
Mark Mitchell wrote:
> Joseph S. Myers wrote:
>
>> As code shared by GCC and glibc I would suggest the same license notice as
>> soft-fp (LGPL >= 2.1 + exception) to allow an identical file to be shared.
>> (Indeed, soft-fp uses this header.) The version in GMP diverged long ago
>> so sharing
On Tue, 20 Jan 2009, Mark Mitchell wrote:
> Mark Mitchell wrote:
> > Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> >
> >> As code shared by GCC and glibc I would suggest the same license notice as
> >> soft-fp (LGPL >= 2.1 + exception) to allow an identical file to be shared.
> >>
> >> (Indeed, soft-fp uses this
