On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 11:17:32AM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 10:08:39PM +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
I really think we need to do (limited) -fvar-tracking even for -O0, it is
really bad that most arguments have wrong locations through the prologue,
while at -O1
On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 10:08:39PM +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
I really think we need to do (limited) -fvar-tracking even for -O0, it is
really bad that most arguments have wrong locations through the prologue,
while at -O1 or above they often have correct location.
We should just do the
So, after I tested and installed this patch
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-06/msg00903.html I started
looking closely at the guality (debug info quality) test results.
So far, I have only added two very simple tests to the guality
testsuite, but they already show very promising results.
On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 9:29 AM, Alexandre Olivaaol...@redhat.com wrote:
So, after I tested and installed this patch
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-06/msg00903.html I started
looking closely at the guality (debug info quality) test results.
So far, I have only added two very simple
Yes, I don't like -O0 producing worse debug info - what does
the -O0 -fvar-tracking-assignments results look like?
I'd do the opposite: totally disable VTA at -O0 like we do for -fvar-tracking.
We once tried to enable -fvar-tracking with -O0 at AdaCore and ended up with
bloated and inferior
On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 8:00 PM, Eric Botcazouebotca...@adacore.com wrote:
Yes, I don't like -O0 producing worse debug info - what does
the -O0 -fvar-tracking-assignments results look like?
I'd do the opposite: totally disable VTA at -O0 like we do for -fvar-tracking.
We once tried to enable
Well, I see FAILs for -O0 compared to -O1 with VTA - that doesn't look
right. How we fix this is not relevant - but we should try to do so.
It would be better not to artificially introduce them in the first place.
--
Eric Botcazou
On Jun 13, 2009, Richard Guenther richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes, I don't like -O0 producing worse debug info - what does
the -O0 -fvar-tracking-assignments results look like?
No difference, -fvar-tracking is disabled at -O0, so either
-fvar-tracking-assignments gets disabled as well
On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 08:00:35PM +0200, Eric Botcazou wrote:
Yes, I don't like -O0 producing worse debug info - what does
the -O0 -fvar-tracking-assignments results look like?
I'd do the opposite: totally disable VTA at -O0 like we do for -fvar-tracking.
We once tried to enable
