PROTECTED]
08.03.2007 19:08
To
Kai Tietz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc
Ian Lance Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED], gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject
Re: What does coding-style tells about integer types for pointers ?
On Thu, Mar 08, 2007 at 06:06:57PM +0100, Kai Tietz wrote:
In gcc the file emutls.c assumes that a long
Please stop top-posting.
Kai Tietz writes:
Richard Henderson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
08.03.2007 19:08
On Thu, Mar 08, 2007 at 06:06:57PM +0100, Kai Tietz wrote:
In gcc the file emutls.c assumes that a long has sizeof void * in
function
emutls_destroy.
Not really. It
Hi,
while porting gcc to the new target x86_64-pc-mingw32 I noticed, that on
many places the long type is wrongly used as equivalent for pointers. This
leads for this MS compatible target to some problems, because the long is
just 4 bytes long and the pointer 8 bytes. I found this problems
I found this problems until now in libc++, libiberty.
Could you be more specific about the libiberty ones?
: +49-941-78004-0
FAX: +49-941-78004-489
WWW: http://www.OneVision.com
DJ Delorie [EMAIL PROTECTED]
08.03.2007 17:04
To
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject
Re: What does coding-style tells about integer types for pointers ?
I found this problems until now in libc
In libiberty I found the following points.
Do any of these cause real failures?
://www.OneVision.com
DJ Delorie [EMAIL PROTECTED]
08.03.2007 17:30
To
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject
Re: What does coding-style tells about integer types for pointers ?
In libiberty I found the following points.
Do any of these cause real failures?
On Thu, 8 Mar 2007, Kai Tietz wrote:
while porting gcc to the new target x86_64-pc-mingw32 I noticed, that on
many places the long type is wrongly used as equivalent for pointers. This
leads for this MS compatible target to some problems, because the long is
just 4 bytes long and the
Phone: +49-941-78004-0
FAX: +49-941-78004-489
WWW: http://www.OneVision.com
Ian Lance Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
08.03.2007 18:02
To
Kai Tietz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject
Re: What does coding-style tells about integer types for pointers ?
Kai Tietz [EMAIL PROTECTED
: +49-941-78004-0
FAX: +49-941-78004-489
WWW: http://www.OneVision.com
Joseph S. Myers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
08.03.2007 18:00
To
Kai Tietz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject
Re: What does coding-style tells about integer types for pointers ?
On Thu, 8 Mar 2007, Kai Tietz wrote
On Thu, 8 Mar 2007, Kai Tietz wrote:
As I know, the types are declared in config/stdint.m4, which is part of
gcc, isn't it ?
There are many different things part of GCC can mean.
Different parts of GCC may wish to know these types for the build system,
for the host system or for the target
On Thu, Mar 08, 2007 at 06:06:57PM +0100, Kai Tietz wrote:
In gcc the file emutls.c assumes that a long has sizeof void * in function
emutls_destroy.
Not really. It assumes you can store the size of the array
in min(sizeof(long), sizeof(void*)) bytes.
r~
12 matches
Mail list logo
