Re: Who should fix platforms broken by extern inline hack?

2007-03-05 Thread Joseph S. Myers
On Mon, 4 Mar 2007, Ian Lance Taylor wrote: FX Coudert [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I'd like to ping these two problems :) i386-unknown-netbsdelf2.0.2 (and possibly newer versions) and i386-pc- mingw32 (latest released version) are still completely broken on mainline, as they have been

Re: Who should fix platforms broken by extern inline hack?

2007-03-05 Thread Ian Lance Taylor
Joseph S. Myers [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Mon, 4 Mar 2007, Ian Lance Taylor wrote: FX Coudert [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I'd like to ping these two problems :) i386-unknown-netbsdelf2.0.2 (and possibly newer versions) and i386-pc- mingw32 (latest released version) are still

Re: Who should fix platforms broken by extern inline hack?

2007-03-05 Thread Joseph S. Myers
On Mon, 5 Mar 2007, Ian Lance Taylor wrote: I only made one of the changes Jakub suggested: I fixed a typo in the documentation. So I didn't bother sending another copy. For clarity, here is the current version of the patch. This patch is OK. -- Joseph S. Myers [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Who should fix platforms broken by extern inline hack?

2007-03-05 Thread Geoffrey Keating
On 04/03/2007, at 12:25 AM, FX Coudert wrote: I'd like to ping these two problems :) i386-unknown-netbsdelf2.0.2 (and possibly newer versions) and i386- pc-mingw32 (latest released version) are still completely broken on mainline, as they have been for more that three months. I spent

Re: Who should fix platforms broken by extern inline hack?

2007-03-04 Thread FX Coudert
I'd like to ping these two problems :) i386-unknown-netbsdelf2.0.2 (and possibly newer versions) and i386-pc- mingw32 (latest released version) are still completely broken on mainline, as they have been for more that three months. As it turns out, I do now have access to a NetBSD system,

Re: Who should fix platforms broken by extern inline hack?

2007-03-04 Thread Ian Lance Taylor
FX Coudert [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I'd like to ping these two problems :) i386-unknown-netbsdelf2.0.2 (and possibly newer versions) and i386-pc- mingw32 (latest released version) are still completely broken on mainline, as they have been for more that three months. This patch (not yet

Re: Who should fix platforms broken by extern inline hack?

2007-03-04 Thread Mark Mitchell
Ian Lance Taylor wrote: FX Coudert [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I'd like to ping these two problems :) i386-unknown-netbsdelf2.0.2 (and possibly newer versions) and i386-pc- mingw32 (latest released version) are still completely broken on mainline, as they have been for more that three

Who should fix platforms broken by extern inline hack?

2007-01-30 Thread François-Xavier Coudert
Hi all, There are two platforms on which mainline is broken: * bootstrap is broken for i386-netbsd, see PR30058 * the compiler built on i386-mingw32 is unusable, see PR30589 Both regressions were introduced by Geoffrey Keating (http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-11/msg3.html) in a C99

Re: Who should fix platforms broken by extern inline hack?

2007-01-30 Thread Ian Lance Taylor
François-Xavier Coudert [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: There are two platforms on which mainline is broken: * bootstrap is broken for i386-netbsd, see PR30058 * the compiler built on i386-mingw32 is unusable, see PR30589 Both regressions were introduced by Geoffrey Keating

Re: Who should fix platforms broken by extern inline hack?

2007-01-30 Thread Geoffrey Keating
On 30/01/2007, at 8:48 AM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote: François-Xavier Coudert [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: There are two platforms on which mainline is broken: * bootstrap is broken for i386-netbsd, see PR30058 * the compiler built on i386-mingw32 is unusable, see PR30589 Both regressions

Re: Who should fix platforms broken by extern inline hack?

2007-01-30 Thread François-Xavier Coudert
As it turns out, I do now have access to a NetBSD system, and will look at that problem when I next get time. Thanks. When you provid a patch, I will test it. (If someone else ever wants access to a netbsd system, it's worth noting there's one on the GCC compile farm!) My understanding from